Comparison of Eccentric Exercise and Static Stretching on Muscle Flexibility

Muscle Stretching Exercise, Range of Motion, Articular

Eccentric resistance exercise, Static Stretching, Muscle Flexibility, Range of Movement

Background: Muscle flexibility is a fundamental physical quality for body development, daily life and sports activities, and also for maintaining muscle quality during aging. Limited flexibility leads to an increased prevalence of musculoskeletal injury in general population and longer return to sports activities. Among the existent strategies to increase muscle flexibility in sports training and physical rehabilitation, static stretching is commonly used by health and physical activity professionals. Its effectiveness in increasing flexibility has been widely demonstrated; however its effects on muscle strength and power remains controversial. Therefore, eccentric resistance exercise has been proposed as an effective intervention for increasing muscle flexibility through structural changes on muscle architecture (pennation angle and fascicle length) with the additional benefit of resistance training on muscle strength and power. Nonetheless, its unknown if the increase in muscle flexibility through eccentric resistance exercise could be similar to what has been previously demonstrated with static stretching.

Hypothesis: The increase in hamstring flexibility after 6 weeks of eccentric resistance training in young males would be similar compared to 6 weeks static stretching training in the same population. Goals: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks eccentric resistance training vs 6 weeks static stretching training on hamstring flexibility in young males. Specific Goals: Determine the effect of 6 weeks excentric exercise training and 6 weeks static stretching training on unilateral maximal isometric voluntary strength between both groups To compare the effect of 6 weeks excentric exercise training and 6 weeks static stretching training in structural changes on muscle architecture (pennation angle, fascicle length and muscle thickness). Methodology: Study design: Forty two young males between 18 and 35 years will be divided into three groups: hamstring eccentric resistance training group (EEG, n=14), hamstring static stretching group (SSG, n=14) and control group (CG, n=14). Volunteers of eccentric resistance training group will be subjected to 6 weeks of Nordic hamstring exercise (3x/wk), while volunteers of static stretching group will be subjected to 6 weeks of hamstring passive static stretching (3x/wk). Control group will not attend any type of intervention. Before and after 6 weeks of training, Knee Extension Angle and Sit and Reach test will be performed for measuring hamstring flexibility. Unilateral Hamstring Isometric Maximal Voluntary Strength will be determined by load cell force transducer, and pennation angle, fascicle length and muscle thickness of Long Head Biceps Femoris will be conducted through muscle ultrasonography Study parameters/endpoint: The main study endpoint is the increase in hamstring flexibility assessed with Knee Extension Angle and Sit and Reach Test. Secondary endpoints include Unilateral Hamstring Isometric Maximal Voluntary Strength (IMVS) and Architectural changes in Long Head Biceps Femoris muscle. Other parameters include age, body weight, body height, body mass index (BMI), level of physical activity. Expected results: With the proposed project, the investigators expect that eccentric exercise training will increase hamstring muscle flexibility at similar level compared with static stretching training. The findings will define the potential of eccentric exercise training on muscle flexibility in healthy participants. These results could expand the benefits of this type of exercise training focused on being included in populations with limited mobility such as elderly and injured populations

No related papers found yet.

Chile