Skip to content

Driving Inclusivity, Validity, and Equity in Research Through Strategic Engagement (DIVERSE)

Driving Inclusivity, Validity, and Equity in Research Through Strategic Engagement (DIVERSE)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06469307
Acronym
DIVERSE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-06-21
Start date
2024-12-09
Completion date
2028-01-30
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Cancer, Leukemia

Keywords

Blood Cancer, Leukemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to enhance inclusion and diversity in clinical trial enrollment by training participants to perform and provide feedback through a community-based protocol review process, called DIVERSE.

Detailed description

This research study aims to pilot a protocol review process, called DIVERSE, assessing its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy to enhance inclusion and diversity in clinical trial enrollment. Patients and community participants will complete specialized training and provide feedback on clinical trials in development through the DIVERSE process; they will also provide feedback on the process itself. Investigator participants will request review and provide feedback on the DIVERSE process. The study is based on community-based participatory research. Participation in this research is expected to last about 18 months. It is expected that about 20 patient and community participants and 20 investigators will participate in this research study. The National Cancer Institute and American Society of Clinical Oncology are providing funding for this research study.

Interventions

OTHERDIVERSE Review Process

A participant and community-based review system for clinical research protocols that elicits and collects feedback on investigator-initiated protocol reviews.

Sponsors

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
American Society of Clinical Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

CAB Participant Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 or older * English speaking * Ability to understand and willingness to provide oral consent * DFCI patient who are in remission from a blood cancer \>1 year will be preferred. CAB Participant

Exclusion criteria

* Adults unable to consent * Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers \<18 years old) * Prisoners. * Unwilling/unable to agree to maintaining the confidentiality of reviews and clinical trial materials, as outlined in Section 9.1 * Note 1: Patients and non-patient community members who are pregnant are eligible. This is a non-interventional study that meets the definition of minimal risk and poses no greater risk to pregnant individuals or fetuses. Pregnancy status will not be assessed. * Note 2: English fluency is necessary as protocols being reviewed are written in English and cannot be feasibly translated to other languages within the time period necessary to complete timely reviews. Investigator Participant Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 older * English Speaking * Site or Principal investigator * Not a member of the research team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Protocol Review Completion Rate18 monthsFeasibility is defined as the proportion of eligible protocols that have completed the DIVERSE review process. The target is a review completion of ≥ 60% of eligible protocols.
Protocol Review Completion Rate Within 35 Days18 monthsFeasibility is defined as the proportion of protocols that have completed the DIVERSE review process within 35 days of request. The goal is to have ≥ to 70% of reviews completed within 35 days.
Proportion of Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Scores of 10 or Greater18 monthsAcceptability is defined as the proportion of AIM scores provided by investigators after protocols have been assessed by the DIVERSE review process with ≥ 60% of AIM scores resulting as ≥10 on a scale of 0 - 20, where scores of 10 or above are considered "acceptable" or greater. The AIM is a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale-based measure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAndrew Hantel, MD
Andrew_Hantel@dfci.harvard.edu617-582-9394
CONTACTOldy S Bejarano, MPH
oldy_bejarano@dfci.harvard.edu857-215-2365
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndrew Hantel, MD

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026