Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of SHR-1819 Injection in Adult Patients With Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SHR-1819 Injection in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06468956
Enrollment
652
Registered
2024-06-21
Start date
2024-06-14
Completion date
2026-08-26
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR-1819 injection in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Interventions

SHR-1819 injection

DRUGPlacebo

placebo

Sponsors

Guangdong Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects voluntarily sign informed consent forms prior to the commencement of any proceedings related to the study, are able to communicate smoothly with the investigator, understand and are willing to complete the study in strict compliance with the requirements of this clinical research protocol; 2. The age was ≥18 at the time of signing the informed consent and gender is unlimited; 3. Atopic dermatitis at screening (according to the 2014 American Society of Dermatology guideline criteria, see Annex 1) and disease duration for at least 1 year before screening as judged by the investigator; 4. EASI ≥ 16, IGA ≥ 3, BSA ≥ 10% during the screening and baseline periods; 5. TCS was not optimal or not tolerated by the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating women; 2. Major surgeries are planned for the duration of the study; 3. History of previous atopic corneal conjunctivitis involving the cornea; 4. History of clinically significant diseases (e.g., circulatory system abnormalities, endocrine system abnormalities, neurological disorders, hematologic disorders, immune system disorders, psychiatric disorders, and metabolic instability) that the researcher believes that participation in the study poses a risk to the safety of the subject or that the disease/illness worsens during the study period will affect the effectiveness or safety analysis; 5. Subjects have had or are currently clinically significant diseases or abnormalities; 6. Screening for people with a history of heavy alcohol consumption or substance abuse in the 3 months prior to screening; 7. The drug has been used in the previous 6 months; 8. Screening of subjects with malignancy within the first 5 years (except completely cured cervical cancer in situ and non-metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma); 9. Other comorbid (or co-occurring) skin disorders may be affected in the study evaluation; 10. Any cause that the researchers believe would prevent the participants from participating in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
At 16 weeks, the proportion of subjects who achieved eczema area and severity index (EASI) -75 (EASI score decreased ≥75% from baseline)up to 16 weeksThe extent of area is assessed using the EASI scale
At week 16, the proportion of participants with an overall investigator assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 and a decrease of ≥2 points from baselineup to 16 weekThe overall degree of improvement was assessed using the IGA scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of subjects whose weekly mean of the daily (PP-NRS) score decreased by 4 points from baseline at Week 16up to 16 weeksPrtch improvement was assessed using the pruritus scale
At week 16, the proportion of subjects who achieved EASI-90 (EASI score ≥90% lower than baseline)up to 16 weeksThe extent of area is assessed using the EASI scale
Proportion of subjects reaching EASI-75 at other visit viewpointsup to 52 weeksThe extent of area is assessed using the EASI scale
The proportion of subjects with IGA score of 0 or 1 and 2 points from baselineup to 52 weeksThe overall degree of improvement was assessed using the IGA scale
Proproportion of subjects with a 2 points from baseline at each iGAup to 52 weeksThe overall degree of improvement was assessed using the IGA scale
Percentage of change and change from baseline in EASI per visit viewpointup to 52 weeksThe extent of area is assessed using the EASI scale
Percentage of subjects with weekly mean PP-NRS scores of 3 points from baselineup to 52 weeksPrtch improvement was assessed using the pruritus scale
Percentage of change and change from baseline in the Skin Quality of Life Index Questionnaire (DLQI) score at each visit viewpointFrom the beginning of administration to the 52 weekSubject quality of life was assessed using the DLQI scale
Percentage of change from baseline in eczema self-assessment (POEM) scores at each viewpointFrom the beginning of administration to the 52 weekSubject quality of life was assessed using the POEM scale
The time of SHR-1819 in the serumFrom the beginning of administration to the 52th weekThe concentration of SHR-1819 in plasma will be determined
The concentration of SHR-1819 in serum: AUCFrom the beginning of administration to the 52th weekThe concentration of SHR-1819 in plasma will be determined
Changes in the level of IgE in the serumFrom the beginning of administration to the 52th weekChanges in the level of biomarkers in serum

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026