Skip to content

Feasibility and Added Value of the TRACMOTION Device for ESD

Feasibility and Added Value of the TRACMOTION Device for ESD

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06468800
Acronym
TRACMOTION
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-06-21
Start date
2024-10-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2024-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oesophageal Neoplasm

Brief summary

A single center non-randomized prospective clinical study, to evaluate the feasibility and added value of the CE-certified Tracmotion device in patients scheduled consecutively for ESD in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. After ESD, the endoscopists' opinion will be evaluated with a short questionnaire on experience with the Tracmotion device. The pathology report will be checked for radicality and microscopic damage of the removed lesion.

Detailed description

Objective: The purpose of this study is to establish feasibility of the Tracmotion device for ESD and to define its added value during ESD in both upper and lower GI procedures, both in antegrade and in retroflex positions. Study design: Single center prospective observational non-randomized clinical study. Study population: A total of 20 consecutive cases scheduled for ESD will be included. Sample size calculation does not apply for this type of study. Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure as planned with the aid of the Tracmotion device. It is anticipated that the Tracmotion will provide superior traction and counter traction compared to off-label tools. Intervention: Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure with the aid of the Tracmotion device. Main study parameters/endpoints: Feasibility: procedure time, dissection speed, lesional damage (tearing or grasping injury to the mucosa on macroscopy and pathological review) Added value: subjective evaluation of the Tracmotion device by the performing endoscopist (contentment of use of Tracmotion, difference in procedure time, stability of, control of and accessibility to the lesion).

Interventions

DEVICETRACMOTION

Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure with the aid of the Tracmotion device

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (upper and lower gastrointestinal tract); * Lesion is accessible with a therapeutic endoscope; * Written informed consent; * Age ≥18 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Coagulopathy (not corrected prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection); * Participating in a different experimental drug/device trial in the previous 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure timeDuring endoscopic submucosal dissection procedureProcedure time of the endoscopic submucosal dissection will be measured from start incision to end incision (in minutes)
Subjective evaluation of the added value of the TRACMOTION deviceImmediately after endoscopic submucosal dissectionDirectly after the endoscopic mucosal dissection the endoscopist will fill in a questionnaire using the Likert scale (1= worst experience possible, 5 = best experience possible) about their experience with the TRACMOTION device during ESD (overall contentment, difference of procedure time, stability of, control of and accessibility to the lesion that was resected)
Lesional damageDuring endoscopic submucosal dissection and during pathology review (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)Any tearing or grasping injury to the mucosa on macroscopy (yes vs. no) observed by the endoscopist and at pathological review (yes/no) observed by the pathologist expressed in percentages (%).
Dissection speedDuring endoscopic submucosal dissection procedureDissection speed of ESD will be measured from start incision to end incision (square millimeter of dissected tissue per minute)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
En-bloc rateDetermined Immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissectionThe incidence of en-bloc resections in percentages (%)
R0 rateDetermined during the pathology review (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)The incidence of R0 resections in percentages (%)
Complications after during and after endoscopic submucosal dissectionDuring endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure and 2 weeks afterComplications will be measured during and after endoscopic submucosal dissection (bleeding yes/no, perforation yes/no) and will be expressed as percentages (%)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
AgeAt baseline (after informed consent is signed)Age in years
Tumor lengthDuring endoscopic submucosal dissection, before incision startsTumor length in millimeter (mm)
GenderAt baseline (after informed consent is signed)Gender (male/female)
Tumor histologyAfter endoscopic submucosal dissection when the pathologist has reviewed the tissue (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)Tumor histology conform the pathology review
Tumor locationDuring endoscopic submucosal dissection, before incision startsTumor location in centimeter (cm) measured from incisors
Prior treatmentAt baseline (after informed consent is signed)Prior treatment of oesophageal neoplasms (such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy)
Use of symptomatic medication2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissectionUse of symptomatic medication during 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection (analgesics, antiemetics, proton pump inhibitors)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026