Strategy for Withdrawal of Pharmacological Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Children (StayDry)

Urinary Incontinence in Children

Urinary incontinence, Withdrawal, Children, Solifenacin, Mirabegron

The primary objective is to investigate if abrupt withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal of pharmacotherapy (solifenacin and/or mirabegron) influences the risk of recurrence of incontinence. Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with urinary incontinence, treated with pharmacotherapy of solifenacin and/or mirabegron and ready for withdrawal will be randomized 1:1 to either abrupt or gradual withdrawal, according to the medical treatment that the child is receiving.

Background and rationale: The pharmacological handling of pediatric incontinence is considered temporary and withdrawal attempts are recommended after continence has been achieved. There is no generally accepted withdrawal strategy for solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children. Currently, two different withdrawal strategies are being employed in the clinical setting, namely abrupt withdrawal, and gradual withdrawal, wherein the dosage of the drug prescribed is reduced or the interval between dosages given is increased. Studies report on the differences in withdrawal strategies of antidiuretic therapy targeted at enuresis in pediatric populations. Several studies have reported on the application of structured withdrawal of desmopressin, indicating that gradual withdrawal of desmopressin therapy results in prolonged intervals of continence without relapse. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the strategy of withdrawal of pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children diagnosed with urinary incontinence that have achieved continence on these pharmaceuticals. Our study is proposed to ensure an evidence-based approach to a withdrawal of strategy for pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children with urinary incontinence. Objectives: The primary objective is to investigate if abrupt withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal of pharmacotherapy (solifenacin and/or mirabegron) influences the risk of recurrence of incontinence. We hypothesize that gradual withdrawal is superior to abrupt withdrawal regarding the risk of recurrence of incontinence. Study design: This is an open-label prospective randomized trial, allocating participant to each of the three pharmaceutical groups, according to the medical treatment that the child is receiving (solifenacin, mirabegron or solifenacin in combination with mirabegron). Within each pharmaceutical group, the participant will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention being compared; either abrupt withdrawal or gradual withdrawal. Perspectives:The results are expected to influence the withdrawal strategy of pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children with daytime urinary incontinence. Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to medical treatment or withdrawal. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study has been approved by the authorities and was initiated in May 2024. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-211-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23833). The study is registered at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).

Denmark