Skip to content

Promoting Neuroplastic Changes of Patients With TBI

Promoting Neuroplastic Changes of Patients With TBI

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06465290
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-06-18
Start date
2026-07-16
Completion date
2030-08-31
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Paraplegia, Acute

Brief summary

This project will develop a wearable rehabilitation robot suitable for in-bed acute stage rehabilitation. It involves robot-guided motor relearning, passive and active motor-sensory rehabilitation early in the acute stage post-TBI including patients who are paralyzed with no motor output. The early acute TBI rehabilitation device will be evaluated in this clinical trial.

Detailed description

Early after TBI, patients often have significant sensorimotor impairment. There is heightened neural excitability, which may be used to facilitate recovery in the acute phase post stroke. However, there has been a lack of effective and practical protocols and devices for early intensive sensorimotor therapy. The proposed randomized clinical trial using a wearable rehabilitation robot, muscle electromyography (EMG), and/or potentially brain electroencephalogram (EEG) signal seeks to provide early intensive sensorimotor training facilitated by real-time audiovisual and haptic feedback, intelligent stretching and sensory stimulation, active movement training through motivating movement games to promote neuroplasticity and reduce sensorimotor impairments. For acute TBI survivors who cannot generate any motor output yet, EMG or EEG may be used to detect the earliest re-emerging motor control signal and the robot can be used to provide demo and feedback of the intended movement.

Interventions

DEVICEMotor relearning training with wearable ankle robot

Ankle motor control relearning training under real-time feedback

DEVICEPassive stretching with wearable ankle robot

Passive stretching under intelligent robotic control

DEVICEGamed-based active movement training with wearable ankle robot

Active movement training through movement games with robotic assistance

DEVICEPassive movement with limited wearable ankle robot

Passive movement in the joint middle range of motion

DEVICEActive movement training with limited wearable ankle robot

Active movement training without robotic assistance

DEVICEAnkle/Wrist torque and motion measurement with limited wearable ankle/wrist robot

Ankle/Wrist torque and motion measurement with no real-time feedback

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized clinical trial with the study group and control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute first time unilateral hemispheric stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, 24 hours after admission to 1 month post-stroke at the start of the proposed treatment) * Hemiplegia or hemiparesis * 0≤Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)\<=2 * Age 30-85 * Ankle impairments including stiff calf muscles and/or inadequate dorsiflexion

Exclusion criteria

* Medically not stable * Associated acute medical illness that interferes with ability to training and exercise * No impairment or very mild ankle impairment of ankle * Severe cardiovascular problems that interfere with ability to perform moderate movement exercises * Cognitive impairment or aphasia with inability to follow instructions * Severe pain in legs * Severe ankle contracture greater than 15° plantar flexion (when pushing ankle to dorsiflexion) * Pressure ulcer, recent surgical incision or active skin disease with open wounds present below knee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMLE)At the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment ends]The Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMLE) assessment is a measure of lower extremity (LE) motor and sensory impairments. The FMLE scale ranges from 0 to 34, with higher scores indicating better motor function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Active range of motion (AROM)At the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment endsAROM will be measured in degrees in the ankle joint while subjects use the muscles to move the ankle.
Passive Range of Motion (PROM)At the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment endsPassive Range of Motion PROM will be measured in degrees in the ankle joint while the robot moves the ankle of the subject strongly.
Strength of the ankle flexor-extensor muscleAt the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment endsStrength of the ankle flexor-extensor muscle will be measured in Newtons
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)At the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment endsThe Modified Ashworth Scale is the most widely used assessment tool to measure resistance to limb movement in a clinic setting. Scores range from 0-4, with 6 choices. 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone; 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM (range of movement); 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved; 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult; 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
Berg Balance ScaleAt the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment endsThe Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. The Berg balance scale ranges from 0 to 56. It is a 14-item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function.
10-meter Walk TestAt the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment endsThe 10 Meter Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance at the beginning and end of 3-week training, and 1 month after the treatment ends. It can be employed to determine functional mobility and gait function.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSoh-Hyun Hur
SoHur@som.umaryland.edu410 706-8625
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLi-Qun Zhang

University of Maryland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026