Skip to content

Treatment Intervention of Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Treatment Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Kinesio Taping on Hand Functions for Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06464809
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-06-18
Start date
2014-09-24
Completion date
2015-12-30
Last updated
2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome, home-based treatment program, kinesio taping, paresthesia, thenar eminence

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of KT versus TENS combining self-myofascial stretching in treatment of CTS through clinical, functional assessment and sensory measurements. Primary hypothesis The KT group has a more substantial improvement in hand grip, pain relief, enhancing proprioceptive sensitivity and dexterity compare to the TENS group. treatment program,

Detailed description

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a home-based treatment program involving Kinesio taping (KT) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) among carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients. Methods: 30 participants with CTS were enrolled, age range, 30 to 60 years. The participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into one of two treatment groups: KT group and TENS group. Participants were blinded to the treatments used in the other group. Patients with CTS received aforementioned treatments compared with reliable qualitative and quantitative evaluation tools before and after 4-week treatment, as well as at a additional 4-week follow-up. The main parameters include the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS), hand grip and key pinch strengths, two-point discrimination (2PD), Modified Moberg pick-up test (MMPUT), and Pain assessment (visual analog scale, VAS).

Interventions

Sponsors

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
China Medical University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into one of two treatment groups: KT group and TENS group. Participants were blinded to the treatments used in the other group.

Intervention model description

This was a prospective, randomized-controlled trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* numbness and tingling in the median nerve territory of the hand. * nocturnal paresthesia. * induction test (Tinel's sign and Phalen's test) showing a positive finding., * is defined as mild and moderate CTS according to nerve conduction studies (NCSs).

Exclusion criteria

* is defined severe CTS symptoms. * are currently pregnant or have any secondary entrapment neuropathy (e.g., diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, hypothyroidism, previous wrist trauma). * cervical radiculopathy or polyneuropathy. * previous history of carpal tunnel decompression surgery. * corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The SSS and FSS of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)pre-intervention, 4-week intervention, and 4-week follow-up.Assess symptoms and functional status. The SSS subscale includes 11 items assessing pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, nocturnal symptoms and over-all functional status. The FSS subscale includes 8 items assessing the hand function during common daily activities. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (1-5), from 1(no symptoms) to 5 (the worst symptoms) for SSS, and from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (cannot perform the activity at all) for FSS. The overall SSS and FSS scores are calculated as the mean of the scores for 11 and 8 individual items respectively, such that the higher the score obtained, the worse the SSS or FSS.
Hand grip and key pinch strengthspre-intervention, 4-week intervention, and 4-week follow-up.pinch strength included palmar, three-jaw chuck, tip, and lateral pinches.
Two-point discrimination (2PD)pre-intervention, 4-week intervention, and 4-week follow-up.cutaneous sensory perception threshold. The larger the value of distance, the worse the sensory ability.
Modified Moberg pick-up test (MMPUT)pre-intervention, 4-week intervention, and 4-week follow-up.hand dexterity. The shorter the time, the more dexterity the hand.
The visual analog scale (VAS)pre-intervention, 4-week intervention, and 4-week follow-up.pain measurement. 100 mm straight line, with 0 mm on the far left and 100 mm on the far right, 0 mm positions It is not painful, and 100 mm is extremely painful.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026