Skip to content

Nodal Burden and Nodal Recurrence in Patients With Isolated Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treated With Axillary Dissection or Nodal Radiation: the OPBC-05/EUBREAST-14R/ICARO Study

Nodal Burden and Nodal Recurrence in Patients With Isolated Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treated With Axillary Dissection or Nodal Radiation: the OPBC-05/EUBREAST-14R/ICARO Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06464341
Acronym
ICARO
Enrollment
583
Registered
2024-06-18
Start date
2023-05-04
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Axillary lymph node dissection, Isolated tumor cells, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Brief summary

The purposes of this multicenter retrospective cohort study are to determine the residual nodal burden in patients with isolated tumor cells detected in the SLN or the clipped node after NAC and to determine oncologic outcomes in this group of patients after ALND or nodal RT or observation.

Detailed description

In the context of upfront surgery, the extent of disease in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) significantly predicts the chances of additional non-SLN metastases during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). For patients with minimal SLN disease (isolated tumor cells \[ITCs\] and micrometastases), the probability of further non-SLN metastases is between 10-20%. In contrast, for patients with macrometastases, the risk increases to 27-33%. In patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), those with positive SLNs exhibit a greater residual nodal burden compared to those treated with upfront surgery. For patients with remaining micro- or macrometastases post-NAC, additional positive lymph nodes are found in over 60% of ALND specimens, regardless of receptor subtype. Consequently, ALND remains the standard care for any residual nodal disease after NAC. Residual ITCs after NAC are present in about 1.5% of all patients undergoing NAC. There is limited data on the likelihood of discovering additional positive lymph nodes in this group, with fewer than 35 documented cases examining residual nodal burden. Therefore, the benefit of ALND for minimal residual disease is uncertain, and axillary management for patients with nodal ITCs is not standardized. Although omitting ALND reduces arm morbidity, identifying residual nodal disease can influence adjuvant therapy recommendations. Despite the lack of consensus on the oncologic safety of omitting ALND in this group, care patterns indicate a growing adoption of this approach. Given the rarity of this clinical scenario and the absence of forthcoming prospective studies, this study utilized real-world data from a large international cohort to determine the incidence of residual non-SLN involvement in patients with ITCs in the SLNs post-NAC, and to compare clinical outcomes in patients with and without ALND as definitive axillary treatment.

Interventions

Observational study no intervention

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Consecutive patients affected with T1-4 N0-3 breast cancer * For cN+: Biopsy proven confirmation is required * For cN0: any axillary staging technique including palpation is allowed * Residual ITCs in the SLN or clipped node * At least 1-year follow-up (12/2021 or later depending on the time of data collection) * For cN0: SLNB with single or dual tracer mapping * For cN+: SLNB with dual mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD: imaging-guided localization of sampled node in combination with SLN procedure with or without dual mapping) * Underwent TAD/SLNB +/- ALND +/- axillary RT

Exclusion criteria

* Male patients * Patients with nodal pCR * Patients with residual nodal micro- or macrometastases * Stage IV disease at presentation * Inflammatory breast cancer (T4d) at presentation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Axillary recurrenceUp to 14 yearsEvaluation of the number of axillary recurrence
Number Axillary RadiotherapyUp to 2 yearsEvaluation of the number of axillary radiotherapy performed
Number of additional micrometastasesDay 0Evaluation of the number of additional micrometastases removed by ALND
Number of additional macrometastasesDay 0Evaluation of the number of additional macrometastases removed by ALND
Number of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND)Day 0Evaluation of the number of ALNDs performed
Number of Tailored Axillary Dissection (TAD)Day 0Evaluation of the number of TAD performed
Number of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB)one time assessment before surgeryEvaluation of the number of SLNB performed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Locoregional recurrenceUp to 14 yearsEvaluation of the number of locoregional recurrence
Invasive recurrenceUp to 14 yearsEvaluation of the number of invasive recurrence
Regional recurrenceUp to 14 yearsEvaluation of the number of regional recurrence

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026