Skip to content

Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection vs Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection vs Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A RandomizeD Trial IN Colorectal Adenomas 10-19mm and Serrated Lesions ≥ 10mm (CARDINAL Study)

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06462521
Acronym
CARDINAL
Enrollment
570
Registered
2024-06-17
Start date
2024-09-06
Completion date
2028-07-31
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Adenoma, Colon Cancer, Colon Polyp, Serrated Polyp

Keywords

Polyp Resection, Cold Snare, Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (Cold EMR), Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection (CSPR), Colonoscopy

Brief summary

The study will compare the use of cold snare piecemeal resection (CSPR) vs cold endoscopic mucosal resection (Cold EMR). The study will include two cohorts: one cohort for conventional adenomas 10-19mm in size and one cohort for serrated lesions 10mm or larger.

Interventions

PROCEDURECold Snare Piecemeal Resection (CSPR)

Qualifying polyps randomized to Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection (CSPR) will be removed using cold snare techniques (no electrocautery, no submucosal injection.)

PROCEDURECold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (Cold EMR)

Qualifying polyps randomized to Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (Cold EMR) will be removed using cold snare techniques (no electrocautery, with submucosal injection.)

Sponsors

Rush University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
University of Kansas Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Vancouver Coastal Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Université de Montréal
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥ 18 years of age 2. Presenting for a screening, surveillance, diagnostic, or therapeutic colonoscopy 3. Found to have: * a sessile serrated lesion or hyperplastic polyp ≥ 10 mm during procedure (Serrated Cohort) or * a 10-19 mm conventional adenoma during procedure (Adenoma Cohort) 4. Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Pedunculated or semi-pedunculated polyps (as defined by Paris Classification type Ip or Isp) 2. Polyps confirmed to be anything other than: * sessile serrated lesion or hyperplastic polyp on histologic diagnosis (Serrated Cohort) or * conventional adenoma on histologic diagnosis (Adenoma Cohort) 3. Patients with Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's disease 4. Polyps with features suggestive of submucosal invasion 5. Polyps that are not able to be removed endoscopically due to location (e.g. extending into appendiceal orifice or diverticulum) 6. Patients with a known or suspected diagnosis of any of the following polyposis syndromes with known genetic mutations: * Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome * MUTYH associated Polyposis Syndrome * Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome * Cowden's Syndrome * Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome 7. Subjects whose colonoscopy procedure is not able to be completed due to bowel prep precluding polyp identification.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Resection (Central Post-Resection Biopsies)1 dayEfficacy of resection will be assessed by biopsies in four or six quadrants of the perimeter of the defect post-resection and two biopsies from the center of the defect post-resection. Comparison of the biopsy pathology results for polyps removed by Cold EMR vs CSPR.
Efficacy of Resection (Peripheral Post-Resection Biopsies)1 dayEfficacy of resection will be assessed by biopsies in four or six quadrants of the perimeter of the defect post-resection and two biopsies from the center of the defect post-resection. Comparison of the biopsy pathology results for polyps removed by Cold EMR vs CSPR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Procedure Time1 dayThe total time it takes to complete the colonoscopy procedure
Polyp Resection Time1 dayThe time it takes to remove the polyp completely
Rate of Recurrence at First Surveillance Colonoscopy for Polyps ≥ 20mmAt first surveillance colonoscopy, typically 6 months to 12 monthsThe recurrence rate of serrated lesions ≥ 20mm measured at the first follow-up colonoscopy
Adverse Events30 DaysThe number of complications for each randomization arm during and after the procedure
Resection Preparation Time1 dayThe time it takes to prepare for polyp removal

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026