Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Brief summary
This is an open, follow-up study to compare the performance of three critical imaging methods to detect chronic active lesions in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in vivo.
Detailed description
Smoldering inflammation is recognized as a critical contributor to MS progression-related central nervous system (CNS) damage. Activated microglia and macrophages particularly at chronic lesion edge are believed to promote lesion growth. Reversing their harmful activity may prove to be an efficient way to halt progression independent of relapses in MS. These smoldering, or chronic active lesions can be detected in vivo using advanced imaging techniques. 1) Specific algorithms can be used to identify lesion growth, with a hypothesis that the slowly evolving lesions (SEL) are the ones harboring a rim of activated microglial cells, which contribute to damage in the surrounding tissue, and lesion growth. 2) Lesions partially or entirely surrounded by rims of increased tissue intensity on QSM-MRI (quantitative susceptibility mapping) sequences are considered as iron rim lesions, with iron-containing proinflammatory microglia/macrophages at the lesion edge. 3) In addition, 18 kDa translocator protein-positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET) imaging can be used to identify chronic active lesions based on TSPO-expression by activated innate immune cells, and their gathering at the edges of chronic active lesions. The TSPO-PET analysis of chronic active lesions can be semi-automated, and the specific radioligand binding at the chronic active lesion edge can be quantitated, which enhances the sensitivity of this method. Despite existing preliminary data demonstrating increased QSM signal TSPO-positive lesions, it is yet to be demonstrated how these three imaging methods perform in identifying chronic active lesions when compared to each other at larger scale.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Turku University Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Signing the informed consent form * MS diagnosis in accordance with McDonald 2017 criteria * Available longitudinal brain MR images (minimum 1 year) * Simultaneous QSM MRI sequence and TSPO-PET * Lesions with iron rim/s
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with other neurodegenerative disease than MS * Patients with other autoimmune disease than MS * Patients with other significant or malignant underlying disease of any other organ system * Patients that are pregnant or breast-feeding * Corticosteroid treatment within 4 weeks of imaging * Patients with significant abnormal findings other than MS in the screening MRI * Patients with claustrophobia, or a history of moderate to severe anxiety disorder or panic attacks (which could potentially lead to preterm termination of the imaging) * Contraindication to PET scan investigations * Exposure to experimental radiation in the past 12 months such that radiodosimetry limits would be exceeded by participating in this study * Intolerance to previous PET scans; i.e. previous hypersensitivity reactions to any PET ligand or imaging agent or failure to participate in and comply with previous PET scans
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of lesions | 18 months, 36 months | The number of lesions identified using each respective method |
| Co-localization of lesions | 18 months, 36 months | Potential co-localization of the RIM+ lesions identified using the various methods. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation of PET imaging and clinical variables | 18 months, 36 months | Imaging variables from PET imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS. |
| Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables | 18 months, 36 months | Imaging variables from MR imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS. |
| Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical variables | 18 months, 36 months | Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS. |
| Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical variables | 18 months, 36 months | Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS. |
Countries
Finland
Outcome results
None listed