Skip to content

Effects of Kaltenborn Versus Mulligan Techniques in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Effects of Kaltenborn Versus Mulligan Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Of The Wrist.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06459453
Enrollment
34
Registered
2024-06-14
Start date
2023-11-23
Completion date
2024-08-06
Last updated
2024-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

: Rheumatoid arthritis, Wrist joint , Kaltenborn, Mulligan

Brief summary

This project was a randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of kaltenborn versus mulligan techniques on pain ,range of motion and functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist The inflammatory polyarthritis that primarily affects the tiny joints is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic autoimmune illness. It is characterized by synovial joint degeneration, joint swelling, and joint discomfort, which can result in disability and early death .All patients of chronic stage,convenience sampling technique was used,subjects following eligibility criteria from Shaikh zayed hospital lahore ,were randomly allocated into two groups ,baseline assessment was done.Group A participants were given Kaltenborn mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy.Group B participants were given Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy.Post intervention assessment was done via,VAS(visual analogue scale),goniometric measurements of wrist ranges,and QUICK DASH score.3 sessions per week were given,Data was analyzed by using SPSS.

Detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis is among the most commonly reported problems to physicians, orthopedics and physical therapist.Even before reporting to clinics there is a long history of using over the counter pain killers.Pain avoidance behaviors let the joint stiff so much that a clinician help is sought.Most times the cause of rheumatoid arthritis is not known therefore it is term as autoimmune disorder.There is a vast literature regarding the management of rheumatoid arthritis and yet after the decades of research there are gaps in the treatment plan.In modern age of health care it is common goal of every health care to make patient self sufficient as early as possible .The self care model has new treatment protocols All patients of chronic stage,convenience sampling technique was used, subjects following eligibility criteria from Shaikh zayed hospital lahore ,were randomly allocated into two groups ,baseline assessment was done. Group A participants were given Kaltenborn mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy .Group B participants were given Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy. Post intervention assessment was done via,VAS(visual analogue scale),goniometric measurements of wrist ranges ,and QUICK DASH score.3 sessions per week were given,Data was analyzed by using SPSS. .This study has compared the effectiveness of kaltenborn versus mulligan mobilization on pain,range of motion and functional disabilty in patients with rheumatoid arthitis of the wrist.The current study was narrative in a way that in literature there is no comparison of two different mobilizations about treating rheumatoid arthritis.These two mobilizations were employed to see which is more effective to improve pain,range of motion and functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist.

Interventions

Per participant was randomized to receive low grade Kaltenborn manual mobilization(grade I).Any tightening of the connective tissues surrounding the joint (grade II) or oscillations followed by additional stretching (grade III).Kaltenborm mobilization is performed for wrist flexion,extension,radial and ulnar deviation.The duration of intervention will be 4 weeks,3 sessions per week, a total of 12 sessions will be given to the study participants. Each session will be last for 30 minutes .Conventional physical therapy will be given to the participants along with kaltenborn.

Per participant gave concurrent application of sustained accessory mobilization applied by a therapist and an active physiological movement to end range applied by the patient. Mulligan mobilization is performed for wrist flexion and extension(in the form of fist)MCP joint flexion and extension,Thumb IC joint flexion and extension, abduction and adduction of fingers, The duration of intervention will be 4weeks,3 sessions per week ,a total of 12 sessions will be given to the study participants .Each session will last for 30 minutes. Conventional physical therapy will be given to the participants along with conventional physiotherapy.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinding refers to a practice where study participants are prevented from knowing certain information that may somehow influence them thereby tainting the results.

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to one of the treatment arms at the begining of the trial and continue in that arm throughout the length of the trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age group between 18 to 65 years. Patients with less than 15degrees of flexion and 30 degrees of extension. * Male and female both are included. * Patients with chronic RA. * Consider only those patients with Ra factor positive. Patients with less than 10degrees of radial deviation and 15 degrees of ulnar deviation. * Patients willing to participate in the whole treatment session and follow up.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had any mental illness (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, Dementia etc) * Patients who had any neurological deficit(paresthesia ,sensory loss, radiculopathy ,myleopathy) * Peripheral vascular diseases. * Any history of surgery related to upper limb. * Patients having metal implants in the upper limbs. Patients with any other serious pathology .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS(visual analogue scale)4 weeksThe visual analogue scale measures pain intensity .it consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain')and 10('worst pain').The patient rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line. .
GONIOMETER4 weeksGoniometer is an instrument used to determine range of motion in patients joint .During rehabilitation, a goniometer would also be used to measure what progress has been achieved in returning back to normal range of motion.In rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist , goniometer measures the range of flexion ,extension ,radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist joint .
QUICK DASH4weeksIt is the 11 item questionnaire that measures upper extremity specific symptoms and disability. It can be used to access any region of the upper extremity. The first 6 items measure the degree of difficulty in performing various physical activities and the other five items related to quality of sleeping, social activities ,daily activities and the intensity of pain and numbness.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactImran Amjad, PhD
imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk03324390125
Backup ContactImran Amjad, PhD
0515481826

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026