Skip to content

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With LinearFirm(ULTRAcel Q+) in Temporary Eyebrow Lifting

Prospective, Single Center, Single Arm, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With LinearFirm(ULTRAcel Q+) in Temporary Eyebrow Lifting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06457607
Enrollment
38
Registered
2024-06-13
Start date
2023-02-24
Completion date
2023-09-27
Last updated
2024-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Keywords

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound, Lifting

Brief summary

Prospective, single center, single arm, open label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with LinearFirm(ULTRAcel Q+) in temporary eyebrow lifting

Detailed description

The goal of this open label study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with HIFU system (LinearFirm(ULTRAcel Q+)) in temporary eyebrow lifting. The target number of subjects for this clinical trial is set to 30 in a single group, without considering the statistical significance of hypothesis testing and dropout rate. Considering a dropout rate of 20%, the plan is to recruit a total of 38 subjects. 1. Evaluation of the effacacy is includes: Evaluation of eyebrow lifting photos by an independent evaluator, Patient Satisfaction (PS) 2. Evaluation of the safety is includes: Adverse events, vital signs, physical examination, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after the application of medical devices for clinical trials

Interventions

DEVICELinearZ

High Intensity Focues Ultrasound

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Jeisys Medical Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 19 years old or older * Voluntarily agreed to the clinical trial * Who is need to eyebrow lifing

Exclusion criteria

* A history of cosmetic treatment (laser, light therapy, surgery, etc..) within the last 6 months * A history of filler treatment (Collagen, AMA, etc...) within the last 6 months * A history of Botulinum toxin injection within the last 6 months * A history of treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy, or history of malignat tumor * A history of infections dermatitis, rash and shingles casued by thermal energy stimulation * A history of treament with isotretinoin, retinoid preparations, or steroid preparations within the last 4 weeks * Pregnancy * Thos who participated in other clinical trials that affect the efficacy and safety evaluation of this clinical trial within 30 days of the screening date

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The avegrage change in AEH (Average Eyebrow Height) and MEH(Maximum Eyebrow Height) compared to the BaselineBase line and 4, 8, 12, 16weeks\- Evaluation of the efficacy : Average change in AEH (Average Eyebrow Height) and MEH (Maximum Eyebrow Height) from the baseline, after the application of a medical device for clinical trials, as evaluated by an independent evaluator's eyebrow lifting photo evaluation at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks. This result will be displayed as a percentage.
The evaluation of the GLS (Glabellar Line Scale) compared to the BaselineBase line and 4, 8, 12, 16weeks\- Evaluation of the Exploratory 1. The proportion of participants who showed an improvement of 2 points or more in the Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) evaluation of the most frowning state at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks after the application of a medical device for clinical trials, compared to the baseline. 2. The proportion of participants who showed an improvement of 1 points or more in the Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) evaluation of the most frowning state at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks after the application of a medical device for clinical trials, compared to the baseline.
The evaluation of the TEAE (Treatment Emergent Adverse Event) and serious AE/ADEafter 16weeks1. The frequency and percentage of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE), Adverse Device Effects (ADE), and Serious Adverse Events/Adverse Device Effects (Serious AE/ADE) that occurred after the application of the medical device for clinical trials are presented. 2. The frequency and percentage (%) of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE), Adverse Device Effects (ADE), and Serious Adverse Events/Adverse Device Effects (Serious AE/ADE) that occurred after the application of the medical device for clinical trials are presented.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026