Skip to content

Demineralized Dentin Allograft Versus Demineralized Dentin Autograft for Socket Preservation

The Demineralized Dentin Allograft Versus Demineralized Dentin Autograft for Socket Preservation After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06457373
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-06-13
Start date
2026-08-13
Completion date
2027-08-30
Last updated
2026-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Keywords

Socket preservation, Impacted mandibular third molar, Alveolar ridge Augmentation

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate and compare clinically and radiographically the effectiveness of Demineralized Dentin Allograft (DDA) versus Demineralized Dentin Autograft (Auto-DD) for preservation of alveolar ridge dimensions after surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDemineralized Dentin Allograft

20 sockets are randomly allocated to receive the Demineralized Dentin Allograft (split-mouth study)

PROCEDUREDemineralized Dentin Autograft

20 sockets are randomly allocated to receive the Demineralized Dentin Autograft (split-mouth study)

Sponsors

Horus University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

20 sockets will be grafted with Demineralized Dentin Allograft (DDA) and 20 sockets will be grafted with Demineralized Dentin Autograft (Auto-DD)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged between 25 to 35 years old. 2. Patients scored as (ASA I). 3. No adverse habits such as smoking, tobacco chewing, alcohol. 4. Patients having bilaterally impacted mandibular third molar with similar degree of difficulty according to (Kim JY, et al). 5. The recipient alveolar sockets are free of any pre-existing periapical pathology, based on x-ray. 6. Alveolar sockets with a depth of 5 mm or more, using periodontal probe for assessment. 7. Patients sign a consent for all procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\) Pregnant or lactating patients. 2) Relevant systemic diseases. 3) Patients with history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measuring and comparing the height of bone between the two groupsImmediately post-operative, 3months post-operative, 6months post-operativeWe will measure the height of the alveolar ridge clinically by using ridge mapping caliper (special caliper forceps used for measuring ridge dimensions) and radiographically on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and comparing the results of the study group (20 sockets) with the control group (the other 20sockets), to assess the effectiveness of Demineralized Dentin Allograft for ridge preservation
Measuring and comparing the width of bone between the two groupsImmediately post-operative, 3months post-operative, 6months post-operativeWe will measure the width of the alveolar ridge clinically by using ridge mapping caliper (special caliper forceps used for measuring ridge dimensions) and radiographically on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and comparing the results of the study group (20 sockets) with the control group (the other 20sockets), to assess the effectiveness of Demineralized Dentin Allograft for ridge preservation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess and comparing the mouth opening of both groupsOne day post-operative, one week post-operativeAssess the mouth opening of the patient using a millimeter ruler (by measuring the distance between maxillary incisal edge and mandibular incisal edge) and comparing the results of both groups
Assess and comparing the swelling of both groupsOne day post-operative, one week post-operativeSwelling levels after surgery will be measured using anatomic landmarks (Tragus-Labial commissure and Tragus-Pogonion), the distances between the landmarks used for the evaluation methods will be measured before the operation. All measurements will be done using millimeter ruler, while the patient will be seated.
Assess and comparing the pain of both groupsOne day post-operative, one week post-operativewe will use the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain measurement
Assess and comparing the soft tissue parameters (bleeding on probing and color of the gingiva) of both groupsOne day post-operative, one week post-operativeThe bleeding on probing will be assessed by using periodontal probe and this will be done around mandibular first and second molars

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTMohamed Habib, B.D.S
mbasiouny@horus.edu.eg+2001069505336
CONTACTAhmed Khalil, PHD
akhalil@horus.edu.eg+2001005062045
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohamed Habib, B.D.S

Faculty of Dentistry- Horus University in Egypt

STUDY_DIRECTORAhmed Khalil

Faculty of Dentistry- Horus University in Egypt

STUDY_DIRECTOREman Abdelsalam

Faculty of Dentistry- Horus University in Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 19, 2026