Skip to content

A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Traditional Buddhist Mindfulness Training Versus Secular Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Patients Having Residual Depressive Symptoms

Comparing the Efficacy of Traditional Buddhist Mindfulness Training Versus Secular Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Residual Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Depressive Disorders: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06456931
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-06-13
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2024-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression Mild, Depression Moderate

Keywords

mindfulness, depression, religiosity

Brief summary

This interventional study is conducted with the goal of comparing the efficacy of traditional Buddhist mindfulness training versus secular mindfulness based cognitive therapy among patients with depressive disorders. We are also interested in studying how these interventions compare in terms of preventing further relapses of depression. Additionally, this study aims to identify factors that influence the efficacy of this intervention, such as self-report mindfulness, self-compassion, and religiosity.

Detailed description

This study has the following objectives: 1. To investigate whether traditional Buddhist mindfulness training is non-inferior to secular MBCT in reducing depressive symptoms and improving psychological wellbeing (primary outcomes) 2. To compare the effectiveness of the two interventions on self-compassion, mindfulness, and spirituality/religiosity (secondary outcomes) 3. To investigate whether self-compassion, mindfulness, and spirituality/religiosity mediate the effectiveness of the interventions 4. To investigate whether baseline spirituality/religiosity moderates the effectiveness of the interventions 5. To compare the effectiveness of the two interventions in preventing depressive relapse over 6 months and 12 months. This will be a parallel group, randomized controlled trial conducted at Colombo North Teaching Hospital (CNTH), and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya and involves interventions conducted over 4 months, followed by 12 months of follow-up. Patients with a history of depressive disorder will be recruited from the Psychiatry Clinic, Colombo North Teaching Hospital. Sample size, calculated for a non-inferiority trial design, is 30 in each group. Simple randomization and allocation concealment using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes will be used. Both groups will undergo interventions over 8 weeks, with weekly 2-hour sessions. One group will undergo the novel intervention, i.e., traditional Buddhist mindfulness training. The other group will undergo MBCT. Primary outcomes will be depressive symptom severity (Beck Depression Inventory-II), Psychological wellbeing (WHO-5 Wellbeing Index), and the depressive relapse rate at 6 months and 1 year after completion of intervention. Secondary outcomes include mindfulness (Six-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire), Self-compassion (Self-compassion scale - short form), Spirituality/religiosity (BENEFIT scale), and Acceptability/feasibility. To establish non-inferiority, the 95% CI of the mean difference will be compared against the non-inferiority margin. Moderator and mediation analyses will be conducted.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTraditional Buddhist mindfulness

Details are provided in the arm/group descriptions.

BEHAVIORALsecular mindfulness based cognitive therapy

Details are provided in the arm/group descriptions.

Sponsors

Anuradha Baminiwatta
Lead SponsorOTHER
Curtin University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Melbourne
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

As the study involves two psychological/behavioural interventions, it will not be possible to mask the participants, care providers or the investigators. However, most outcomes are based on self-report ratings, and the outcome at the end of the intervention (relapse of depression) will be assessed using telephone interviews by investigators blind to the participant's study arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or above * Buddhist faith (Only Buddhists are selected as one of the interventions involves Buddhist teachings, and any recruited participant has a probability of being enrolled in the Buddhist mindfulness intervention) * A history of one or more episodes of moderate or severe depression * Currently having BDI-II score \> 13, i.e., mild to moderate depressive symptoms

Exclusion criteria

* Currently having a severe depressive episode, according to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) Sinhalese version * Currently having moderate to severe suicidal ideation (according to CIDI) * Recent changes in antidepressant medication * Unable to understand and communicate in Sinhalese

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relapses of depressionAt 6 months and 1 year after completion of interventionDepressive relapse rate assessed using Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Psychological wellbeingBaseline (T0), Post-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baselineWHO Wellbeing Index - 5 score
Depressive symptom severityBaseline (T0), Post-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baselineBeck Depression Inventory -II Score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spirituality/religiosityBaseline (T0), Post-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baseline6-item BENEFIT scale - Sinhala (Xue et al., 2016)
Self-report mindfulnessBaseline (T0), Post-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baseline20-item Six-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire - Sinhala (Baminiwatta et al. 2022)
Self-compassionBaseline (T0), Post-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baseline12-item Self-compassion scale - short form - Sinhala ( De Zoysa et al., 2021)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of the interventionPost-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baselinemeasured using two items: Item 1 will ask participants to rate their overall satisfaction with the intervention using a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (quite dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Item 2 will ask participants to rate how helpful they believed the intervention was for them on a scale from 1 (not at all helpful) to 10 (very helpful).
Feasibility of the interventionPost-intervention (T1) 8 weeks from baselineSession attendance (i.e., the total number of weekly sessions attended); home practice completion (i.e., number of days that home practice was completed); and retention rates will be used as indicators of feasibility. Home practice will be assessed using a homework record form over the 8-week intervention period. Retention rate will be operationalized as the percentage of enrolled participants who complete the primary outcome assessment, and attend at least 4 out of the 8 sessions.

Countries

Sri Lanka

Contacts

Primary ContactAnuradha Baminiwatta, MBBS, MD
baminiwatta@kln.ac.lk+94777959197
Backup ContactMiyuru Chandradasa, MBBS, MD, MRCPsych
miyuruc@kln.ac.lk+94764628833

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026