Skip to content

IntraCERvical Balloon Catheter in the Setting of Induction of Labor for Fetal Loss or Abortion

IntraCERvical Balloon Catheter in the Setting of Induction of Labor for Fetal Loss or Abortion (CERBI): a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06456164
Acronym
CERBI
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-06-13
Start date
2025-02-01
Completion date
2025-04-10
Last updated
2025-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abortion, Complete, Fetal Death, Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Keywords

induction termination, medication abortion

Brief summary

The goal of this research is to understand whether it is practical and safe to use an intracervical balloon catheter in addition to standard of care medications at the time of an induction of labor for an abortion or fetal death. The medical device used in this study is cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is used for induction of labor at term gestational ages (at or above 37 weeks of gestation). The study team will also collect data about patient-level experiences with the procedure, time in labor, and labor-related complications, such as higher-than-expected blood loss or infection.

Detailed description

Commonly, induction of labor in the second trimester is accomplished with the use of oral anti-progestin medications (i.e., mifepristone) at least 24 hours prior to administration of sublingual, buccal, or vaginal prostaglandins (e.g., misoprostol). Innovation over the past decade has largely been focused on the concomitant use of mechanical dilation for induction of labor in order to reduce the time from initiation of labor to delivery. However, limited data exist to demonstrate the efficacy of an intracervical balloon catheter during second-trimester induction of labor. Therefore, the principal investigator seeks to conduct a feasibility randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether an intracervical balloon catheter - commonly used for inductions of labor at later gestational ages - can be used during second-trimester inductions of labor.

Interventions

The Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon is a double-balloon catheter designed to mechanically ripen the cervix prior to labor induction when the cervix is unfavorable for induction.

Sponsors

University of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Maternal age ≥ 18 * English or Spanish-speaking * Cervical dilation \< 3 centimeters * Gestational age between 22w0d and 27w6d

Exclusion criteria

* Maternal age \< 18 * Non-English- or Spanish-speaking * Cervical dilation ≥ 3 centimeters * Gestational age below 22w0d or above 27w6d * Allergy to mifepristone or misoprostol * Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome * Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy * Placenta previa or suspected placenta accreta spectrum disorder * Placental abruption * Suspected intraamniotic infection * Rupture of membranes * Untreated genitourinary tract infection * 3 or more cesarean deliveries, classical cesarean delivery, or endometrial cavity-entering myomectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants who experience deathUp to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants requiring blood transfusion after expulsion of the fetus and placentaUp to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants requiring uterotonicsUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryNeed for misoprostol, carboprost, and/or methergine after expulsion of the fetus and/or placenta
Number of participants requiring adjunctive procedures in the setting of postpartum hemorrhageUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryDilation and curettage, insertion of intrauterine tamponade device (i.e., Bakri or Jada devices), uterine artery embolization, exploratory laparotomy, O'Leary and/or B-Lynch sutures, and/or other uterine-conserving surgical measures to control hemorrhage
Number of participants requiring hysterotomy or dilation and evacuationDuring delivery hospitalization (within the first 72 hours after admission)Need for hysterotomy or dilation and evacuation in setting of failed induction of labor
Number of participants diagnosed with a uterine ruptureWithin the first 12 hours after expulsion of the fetus
Number of participants requiring intensive care unit admissionUp to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants requiring readmission to the hospital within 6 weeks of deliveryUp to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants diagnosed with a cervical lacerationDuring delivery hospitalization (within 72 hours after delivery)
Number of participants diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis or postpartum endometritisUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryMaternal temperature greater than 39°C or 38-38.9°C with evidence of leukocytosis or purulent cervical drainage
Number of participants diagnosed with sepsisUp to 6 weeks post-deliverySepsis in Obstetrics Score \> 6. Score calculated from maximum maternal temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, white blood cell count, and serum lactic acid
Number of participants diagnosed with septic shockUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryHypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg and serum lactate level \>2 mmol/L (18mg/dL) despite adequate volume resuscitation
Number of participants diagnosed with postpartum hemorrhageUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryEstimated or quantitative blood loss greater than 1000 mL at the conclusion of expulsion of the fetus and placenta

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported distressUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryImpact of Event scale (0-88), with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress
Patient-reported acceptability of interventionUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryassessed via the question Would you have the same procedure again if you had to have another second-trimester induction of labor? and Did you think the second-trimester induction of labor was better or worse than expected?
Patient-reported satisfactionDuring intrapartum period (up to 72 hours after delivery)Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (8-22), with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction
Total duration of labor, in hoursDuring intrapartum period (up to 72 hours after delivery)Total duration from initiation of misoprostol to expulsion of the fetus, in hours
Total blood loss, in millilitersWithin the first 24 hours after expulsion of the fetus and placentaTotal blood loss after expulsion of the fetus and placenta
Number of participants requiring dilation and curettage or manual extraction of the placentaWithin the first 12 hours after expulsion of the fetus
Patient-reported painUp to 6 weeks post-deliveryUse of visual analog scale (0-10), with higher scores indicating worse levels of pain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026