Skip to content

Randomized Study Using SM-030 Gel for Adults With Melasma

A Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Twice Daily Application of SM-030 Gel 0.64% Vs. SM-030 Gel 0.08% Vs. Placebo Gel in Adults With Melasma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06454747
Enrollment
138
Registered
2024-06-12
Start date
2024-06-27
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2024-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma

Brief summary

Brief Summary This is a phase 2b, observer-blinded, randomized study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied SM-030 gel 0.64% and SM-030 gel 0.08% compared against placebo gel in healthy adult male and female subjects with Melasma. The study will be comprised of a 12-week twice daily dosing period and a 4-week additional safety follow-up period. Approximately 138 subjects who meet the eligibility criteria, notably with a clinical diagnosis of Melasma will be randomized in a 3:2:1 ratio to one of three treatment arms: SM-030 gel 0.64% (N=69), Placebo gel (N=46), or SM-030 gel 0.08% (N=23). Subjects will be competitively enrolled in Mexico and El Salvador across 5 sites (4 sites in Mexico and 1 in El Salvador). Subjects will be assessed for safety and efficacy at each visit.

Interventions

DRUGSM-030 gel 0.64%

Topical application to face twice daily for 12 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo gel

Topical application to face twice daily for 12 weeks.

DRUGSM-030 gel 0.08%

Topical application to face twice daily for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

DermBiont, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized 3-arm tranche of main cohorts

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study: 1. Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study: 2. Male or Female age 18-65 with Fitzpatrick skin type II through V and a clinical diagnosis of Melasma 3. Subjects with moderate to severe Melasma using the following guidelines: 1\. Stable (unchanged per subject reporting) melasma for at least 3 months 2. Macular lesions, neither depressed nor atrophic 3. Melasma Severity Score of at least 2 (hyperpigmentation at least moderately darker than surrounding normal skin 3. Ability to understand, agree to, and sign the study informed consent form (ICF). 4\. For female or childbearing subjects, they must be on an agreeable form of birth control (oral contraceptive therapies, estrogen replacement therapies, other non-oral hormonal therapies, IUDs, be abstinent, or have a vasectomized partner) and who have not added and/or changed the method of birth control in the last 6 months, and have no intention of adjusting or changing the method of birth control 5. Agree to discontinue all agents used to treat hyperpigmentation, aging or exfoliate the skin during the course of the study. Makeup and moisturizers are permitted. 6\. Agree not to change their sun exposure at work, home, or leisure and apply study supplied sunscreen daily. 7\. Technical ability and willingness to apply Investigational product. 8. Willing to allow digital photos of treatment and comparison areas to be taken and stored. 9\. Willing to apply study-supplied mineral sunscreen, moisturizer, and cleanser to the face daily throughout the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded in the study: 1. Positive urine pregnancy test, pregnant, lactating, or female of childbearing potential who does not agree to use an active method of birth control for the duration of the study. 2. Conditions at baseline that would interfere with evaluation of UV-tanned skin, especially other pigmentary disorders including, but not limited to vitiligo affecting the treatment and comparison sites. 3. Severe photodamage as assessed by the 10-point photo damage assessment scale (Griffiths et al., 1992); (McKenzie et al., 2011). 4. Presence of known concomitant diseases associated with the development of hyperpigmentation (e.g., thyroid, liver, adrenal). 5. Current tanning booth exposure or any kind of phototherapy within 3 months of Screening. 6. Current or past use of monobenzyl ether to depigment skin. 7. Use of the following topical preparations within a 28-day washout period: topical corticosteroids, topical bleaching products (hyroquinone, niacinamide, kojic acid, ascorbic acid, chemical peels, topical tranexamic acid (TXA)), UV light therapy and sunbathing, topical retinoids. 8. Use of the following systemic agents within the specified washout periods: 1\. Systemic corticosteroids (28 days) 2. Systemic cyclosporine, interferon (6 months) 3. Systemic acitretin, etretinate, isotretinoin (6 months) 4. Systemic methotrexate (6 months) 5. Systemic tranexamic acid (TXA) 6. Systemic photoallergic, phototoxic, and or photosensitizing drugs (6 months including psoralens, sulfonamide drugs, tetracycline antibiotics, thiazide diuretics, phenothiazines, coal tar and derivatives, and tricyclic antidepressants, chlorpromazine, benoxaprofen, piroxicam, nalidixic acid, procainamide, phenytoin, antimalarial medications, some cystostatic agents) 9\. Laser (ablative or non-ablative), microneedling, PRP, or light-based treatment of the treatment areas within 3 months of Screening. 10\. Any dermatological conditions within the designated application area that could interfere with clinical evaluations or any disease state or physical condition which might expose the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation (neurodermatitis, eczema, psoriasis, atrophy, rosacea, seborrheic dermatits, etc.). 11\. Any underlying disease(s) or other dermatological conditions that require the use of exclusionary topical or systemic therapy (see

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Investigator Assessment of Global Improvement (IAGI) for subjects receiving SM-030 compared to placebo12 weeks after first doseSuperiority of each Active over Placebo based on proportion of subjects with a lower Investigator Assessment of Global Improvement at Week 12 compared to Baseline. Minimum value 0 is best, or completely clear. Maximum value is 6, or worse and darker pigmentation.
Change in Investigator Assessment of Global Improvement (IAGI) for subjects receiving different SM-030 concentrations12 weeks after first doseSuperiority of SM-030 gel 0.64% over SM-030 gel 0.08% based on proportion of subjects with a lower Investigator Assessment of Global Improvement at Week 12 compared to Baseline. Minimum value 0 is best, or completely clear. Maximum value is 6, or worse and darker pigmentation.

Countries

El Salvador

Contacts

Primary ContactJoanna Jay
joanna.j@dermbiont.com510-607-8155
Backup ContactEmma Taylor
Emma@Dermbiont.com510-607-8155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026