Skip to content

A Motor Learning Intervention to Target Walking Performance in Ambulant Children With Cerebral Palsy

A "MOtor Learning Based Intervention for Lower Extremities (MOBILE)" to Target Walking Performance in Ambulant Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Feasibility Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06454656
Acronym
MOBILE
Enrollment
14
Registered
2024-06-12
Start date
2024-08-12
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, Spastic Diplegia, Walking, Difficulty

Keywords

Motor Learning Theory, Neuroplasticity, Neurological Rehabilitation

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new therapy approach to improve walking ability in children with Cerebral Palsy is acceptable to the children and the families in a community setting. The main questions we look to answer are: 1. Do the children/teens tolerate the therapy and feel that it is helpful? 2. Do the parents/ families feel the therapy helps and is easy to commit to? 3. Do the children/teens complete all their therapy sessions and assessments as planned? The participants will trial the therapy for 30 hours over 6 weeks and will perform assessments before and after to see if they meet their goals. They will also be interviewed to see how they felt about the therapy when they finish.

Detailed description

The therapy being trialed in this study uses motor learning theory to try and improve or change walking patterns to improve the child/teen's walking goal. Therapy will target their own walking goal and they can choose the format of their therapy as long as they complete 30 hours of which 24 hours must be in the clinic within a 6 week period.

Interventions

OTHERMOBILE

Intensive motor learning based intervention to target specific walking goals as identified using the Gait Outcome Assessment List. Full Protocol outlining strategies available on request. Three key principles underpin the intervention: Principle 1: The type of task Principle 2: The type of practice Principle 3: The type of Feedback

Sponsors

Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Feasibility Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (GMFCS Levels I-III) * Has a specific walking related goal * Has capacity to follow instruction * Has a primary caregiver who can support a home program

Exclusion criteria

* Has had surgery within 6 months of intervention start date * Has had botox/ baclofen within 3 months of intervention start date * Has a dual diagnosis that impacts ability to follow instruction * Has a significant cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment Raterolling recruitment over 1.5 yearsPercentage of eligible numbers recruited
Adherence to InterventionDuration of study 2 yearsPercentage of total hours practiced/ planned dose (30 hours)
RetentionDuration of study 2 yearsPercentage of recruited participants at final follow up
Adverse EventsDuration of study 2 yearsMeasured as Yes or No with description
Fidelity to Intervention ProtocolDuration of study 2 yearsChecklist to measure extent of motor learning principles included in sessions
Feasibility of Outcome Measures (Participant)Duration of study 2 yearsParticipant experience of outcomes captured by semi-structured interviews.
Feasibility of Outcome Measures (Assessor)Duration of study 2 yearsAssessor experience of outcomes captured by semi-structured interview.
Acceptability of InterventionDuration of study 2 yearsSemi-structured interviews of participants and parents to capture acceptability of intervention using Framework of acceptability
Time taken to complete Outcome MeasuresDuration of study 2 yearsMeasured in Minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait Outcome Assessment Listbaseline, upon completion of intervention (2-6 weeks) and 3 month follow up, rolling through duration of study 2 yearsparent/self-report questionnaire developed to measure functional mobility and goals for ambulant children with CP. This measure will be used to power a future definitive trial.
6 minute walk testbaseline, upon completion of intervention (2-6 weeks) and 3 month follow up, rolling through duration of study 2 yearsThis is a measure of gait endurance and has been validated for use in CP. Gait speed will also be calculated using this measure.
10 meter self-selected walking speedbaseline, upon completion of intervention (2-6 weeks) and 3 month follow up, rolling through duration of study 2 yearshabitual walking speed selected as it correlates well with habitual physical activities.
Modified timed up and gobaseline, upon completion of intervention (2-6 weeks) and 3 month follow up, rolling through duration of study 2 yearstests balance and basic mobility in children with physical disabilities and has been validated for use in CP
ankle and knee Range of motionbaseline, upon completion of intervention (2-6 weeks) and 3 month follow up, rolling through duration of study 2 yearsCPIP measures of ankle DF and popliteal angle
Child Health Utilities Index CHU-9Dbaseline, upon completion of intervention (2-6 weeks) and 3 month follow up, rolling through duration of study 2 yearsself-report measure that can calculate quality adjusted life years to measure quality of life.

Countries

Ireland

Contacts

CONTACTCaitriona M O'Shaughnessy
caitrionaoshaug22@rcsi.com0833128927
CONTACTAilish Malone, PHD
ailishmalone@rcsi.ie+3531-4022392
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAilish Malone, PHD

Royal College of Surgeons

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 15, 2026