Skip to content

Efficacy of Different Anesthesia Methods in Transbronchial Biopsy

Exploration on the Efficacy of Different Anesthesia Methods in Transbronchial Biopsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06454513
Acronym
EDAMTBB
Enrollment
800
Registered
2024-06-12
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2024-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Biopsy, Respiratory Diseases

Keywords

Anesthesia method, Bronchoscopic biopsy, Efficiency research

Brief summary

This study investigates the efficacy of different anesthesia methods (general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway and local nebulized anesthesia) for transbronchial biopsy using an electronic bronchoscope. The study retrospectively analyzed cases of transbronchial biopsy performed at the Respiratory Endoscopy Center of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from June 5, 2020, to June 5, 2024. Data collected included age, gender, primary diagnosis, anesthesia method, biopsy method, operation time (excluding general anesthesia and laryngeal mask airway placement time), lesion location and size, pathological results, and follow-up status.

Detailed description

General anesthesia and local anesthesia are the primary anesthesia methods for interventional respiratory endoscopy. While general anesthesia offers greater comfort, it carries anesthesia-related risks. Local anesthesia, on the other hand, provides a relatively low surgical risk and cost-effectiveness. However, there is limited research on whether its diagnostic value is inferior to that of general anesthesia.This study investigates the efficacy of the two anesthesia methods (general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway and local nebulized anesthesia) for transbronchial biopsy. The study retrospectively analyzed cases of transbronchial biopsy performed at the Respiratory Endoscopy Center of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from June 5, 2020, to June 5, 2024. Data collected included age, gender, primary diagnosis, anesthesia method, biopsy method(forcep/cryobiopsy), operation time (excluding general anesthesia and laryngeal mask airway placement time), lesion location and size, pathological results, and follow-up status(pneumothorax、hemorrhage).

Interventions

PROCEDUREgeneral anesthesia

Different anesthesia methods

Sponsors

Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completed Transbronchial Biopsy;the platelets count and PT, APTT tests were normal, normal ECG, Anesthesiologist evaluation was needed in General anesthesia group.

Exclusion criteria

* patients with contraindication of bronchoscopy (such as respiratory failure and acute cardio-cerebrovascular events), and women who were pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic efficacybaselineThe diagnostic positivity rate(%) of transbronchial biopsy under different anesthesia methods between two groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical informationbaselineage(year), gender(male/female), primary diagnosis(lung cancer/pneumonia or other)
lesion location (left/right/other)baselineClinical information
lesion size (mm)baselineClinical information
Postoperative complications (hemorrhage or pneumothorax)baselineClinical information
Operation timeintraoperativeClinical information

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026