Skip to content

Prognostic Estimates Among ICU Clinicians

Prognostic Estimates Among ICU Clinicians Caring for Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06452797
Enrollment
238
Registered
2024-06-11
Start date
2024-06-18
Completion date
2027-06-15
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation

Brief summary

One challenge with decision making for mechanically ventilated is that their prognosis is often uncertain. The ProVent-14 score incorporates clinical variables measured on the 14th day of mechanical ventilation to predict risk of death in one year. The ProVent-14 is easy to calculate has been externally validated. However, it is unclear how often clinicians use the ProVent-14 score to predict long-term outcomes for patients requiring 14 days of mechanical ventilation or if it helps clinicians make more accurate predictions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether ICU clinicians who receive a patient's ProVent-14 score make more accurate predictions for mortality at one year than ICU clinicians who do not.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProVent-14 score

A score to estimate one-year mortality for patients requiring at least 14 days of mechanical ventilation

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ICU day-shift attending physician, fellow physician, advanced practice provider, or nurse * Caring directly for a patient who requires invasive mechanical ventilation, 14-16 days after initial intubation, not actively transitioning to comfort-focused care and not with a neuromuscular disease (i.e. ALS) as a cause of respiratory failure.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of one-year mortality rate predictionsOne-year after participant enrollmentAssociations between participant predictions (0-100% risk of death) and patient outcomes (death or not) will be determined using logistic regression. Accuracy will be determined by Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confidence in predictionUpon enrollment1-10 scale, 10 being most confident
Comfort communicating prognosis to patient/surrogateUpon enrollment1-10 scale, 10 being most comfortable
Recommendation to transition to comfort-focused careUpon enrollmentYes or No
Accuracy of timing of patient deathOne-year after participant enrollmentParticipants who predict the patient has a \<50% chance of survival will be asked to predict the month the patient will pass away

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of factors influencing predictionOne-year after participant enrollmentParticipants will list up to 5 characteristics of the patient's situation that influenced their prediction

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJared Greenberg, MD
jared_greenberg@rush.edu312-942-6744

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026