Skip to content

The Effect of Preserving Inferior Pulmonary Ligamen on Symptom Burden in Thoracoscopic Pneumonectomy

The Effect of Preserving Inferior Pulmonary Ligamen on Symptom Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Thoracoscopic Pneumonectomy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06452680
Acronym
PRO-IPL
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-06-11
Start date
2024-06-30
Completion date
2024-08-31
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Pulmonary Surgical Procedures

Keywords

Inferior pulmonary ligment, Pulmonary Surgical Procedures, Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Brief summary

The investigators conducted a muti-centres randomized controlled clinical trial to explore the effect of preservation of inferior pulmonary ligment compared with dissection.

Detailed description

Dissection of the inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) has been a common practice in upper lobectomy to facilitate the expansion of the remaining lung, reduce dead space after resection, and minimize complications such as pleural effusion and pulmonary infection. However, studies have found that IPL dissection does not improve patient outcomes. On the contrary, releasing the restriction may lead to excessive movement of the remaining lobes, resulting in significant changes in bronchial angles and lung volume, which can worsen pulmonary function and increase postoperative symptoms. Most existing studies are retrospective, providing relatively low-level evidence. Moreover, previous research has primarily focused on radiographic outcomes and pulmonary function tests results, while the effect on patients' symptom burden has been largely overlooked. From the patient's perspective, symptom burden might be more significant, reflecting the clinical value of changes in radiographic and functional indices. In this study, the investigators applied patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms. Combined with pulmonary function results and radiological outcomes, the investigators compared the clinical value of preserving versus dissecting the IPL in upper lobectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPreserving IPL during surgery

IPL was preserved during surgery

Sponsors

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients underwent upper lobe resection 2. Patients could complete our questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous history of ipsilateral lung surgery 2. Patients who underwent pleurodesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cough score postoperationup to 3 monthsThe investigators used PSA-LUNG questionnaire to assess patients symptom burden after surgery. Changing of cough score during 1 month postoperation was chosen as the primary outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Other Symptom burden postoperation PSA-LUNG questionnaireup to 3 monthsUsing PSA-LUNG questionnaire, the investigators assessed shortness of breath, pain, sleeplessness, annoy, and fatigue after surgery.
Radiological outcomeDay 1 after surgery; 1 month after discharge; 3 months after dischargeChanging of bronchial angels measured with chest x-ray examination or chest CT.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactGuibin Qiao, MD
guibinqiao@126.com13602749153

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026