Skip to content

Palatal Versus Buccal Protraction Using Plates Assisted With Facemask in Growing Class III Patients

Palatal Versus Buccal Protraction Using Plates Assisted With Facemask in Growing Class III Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06452368
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-06-11
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2023-11-20
Last updated
2024-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Class III Malocclusion

Brief summary

to compare Palatal and buccal protraction using plates assisted with facemask in growing class III patients

Detailed description

A randomized controlled clinical trial was adopted in this study. A total of 20 growing Class III patients were selected from patients seeking orthodontic treatment. The participants were recruited from the department of Orthodontics at Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. No active advertisement was used for participant recruitment, and instead, a convenience sample was formed. Prior to participating in the study, the purpose of the study was explained to the parents of the children and informed consents and assents were obtained according to the guidelines on human research adopted by the Research Ethics Committee Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

Interventions

DEVICEfacemask

Fixation of miniplates by four screws in the maxilla and protraction by using facemask

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Growing patients with age ranged between 8-13 years old. * Patients should have examination: Class III malocclusion due to maxillary retrusion as verified by clinical and radiographic examination; SNA \<79 and ANB angle \< -1. * Good likelihood of recall availability.

Exclusion criteria

* Vertical skeletal mal relationship. * History of previous orthodontic/orthopedic treatment. * Bad habits that may jeopardize the appliance. * Patients with systemic diseases * Congenital deformities such as cleft lip and/or palate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cephalometric radiographs12 monthcephalometric radiographs were analyzed and the amount of maxillary protraction, the dentoskeletal as well the soft tissue changes were evaluated

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026