Skip to content

Effectiveness Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive Therapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound and Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive (TECAR) Therapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06451094
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-06-10
Start date
2023-05-15
Completion date
2024-02-15
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Energy Transfer Capacitative and Resistive Therapy

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome, TECAR therapy, median nerve CSA

Brief summary

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive (TECAR) therapy on pain, symptom severity and function in patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) based on clinical and electromyography (EMG) findings and to compare it with ultrasound therapy (US). Methods: A total of 42 patients aged between 18 and 65 years, were randomly divided into two groups; group 1, US therapy 5 minutes intermittently for 2 weeks, 5 times a week, for a total of 10 sessions, group 2 TECAR therapy 5 min capacitive (CAP) and 10 min resistive (RES), 3 days a week for 2 weeks, for a total of 6 sessions. Both groups received paraffin therapy and wrist orthosis. All Patients were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and paresthesia levels, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) for symptom severity and functional levels. Additionally, median nerve CSA was measured by ultrasound, at the baseline, post-treatment, first and third months.

Interventions

DEVICEUS therapy

3 MHz probe with a BTL brand device at a dose of 1.5 watts/cm2 for 5 minutes intermittently for 2 weeks, 5 times a week, for a total of 10 sessions.

DEVICETECAR

Transfer Energy Capacitative and Resistive Therapy

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age and over * had pain and numbness in their hands for more than 3 months were evaluated * Patients diagnosed with mild and moderate CTS by EMG

Exclusion criteria

* metabolic, rheumatic, or neurological diseases that could affect the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) * patients who had previously undergone surgery on the wrist, * oncology patients, * pregnancy, * pacemakers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)baseline (0 th day), after-treatment (15 th day), 1th month, 3rd month0 min , 10 is maximum pain score
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)baseline (0 th day), after-treatment (15 th day), 1th month, 3rd monthsymptom severity on functional tasks (Symptom Severity Scale), involving 11 items, and the other one on function status properly (Functional Status Scale), involving 8 items. Both subscales of BCTQ are scored between 1 and 5, and higher scores illustrate a greater degree of disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) measurementbaseline (0 th day), after-treatment (15 th day), 1th month, 3rd monthMedian nerve CSA was measured by ultrasound on axial view at the scaphoid-pisiform level which is a reliable measurement for CTS. Three measurements were taken for analysis and the average value was recorded

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026