Skip to content

The Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound Technique in the Treatment of Facial Skin Laxity

Efficacy and Safety of High Intense Focused Ultrasound for Treating Middle and Lower Face and Submental Region Laxity

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06449911
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-06-10
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2024-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Middle and Lower Face and Submental Region Skin Laxity

Brief summary

This is a prospective study of 20 Chinese patients with lower facial laxity treated by High Intense focused ultrasound (HIFU). Response will be assessed via paired comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment photographs by two independent dermatologists, grading on a 5-point Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) for skin laxity. Quantitative analysis of submental lifting will also be performed. Patient's level of sagging and volume loss, satisfaction and tolerance will be documented.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHIFU

300 lines and 10,200 dots will be performed to each half lower two-thirds of the face and submental area of every participant.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

healthy male or female, aged 30-60 years, seeking improved jawline definition, and/or reduction of submental skin laxity and were willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancy or lactation, severe sun damage, excessive skin laxity on the lower face and neck, keloid scarring or open wounds in the treatment areas, severe or cystic facial acne, history of cosmetic treatments in the area to be treated (skin tightening procedure within the past year; injectable filler or botox within the past 6 months; ablative or nonablative resurfacing/rejuvenating laser treatment or light treatment within the past 6 months; dermabrasion or deep facial peels within the past 6 months), isotretinoin treatment within the past 6 months, and inability to understand the treatment protocol or to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5-point Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) for skin laxity6 months after HIFU treatment0-worse, 1-0%-25% poor response, 2-25%-50% fair response, 3-50%-75% good response, 4-75%-100%-excellent response.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026