Skip to content

Manual Therapy of Spine With Postural Correction Exercise Compared With Conventional Therapy in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis - A Randomised Clinical Trial

C5-C6 and Thoracic Spine Mobilization With Postural Correction Exercise Compared With Conventional Therapy in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis - A Two-group, Parallel-arm, Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06449261
Enrollment
66
Registered
2024-06-07
Start date
2024-02-22
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2024-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder

Brief summary

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is often self-limited but can persist for years and may never fully resolve. The most effective treatment for adhesive capsulitis is uncertain till date. Though neural links are being studied on one side and postural alteration too was postulated to cause shoulder pathology. However, the effectiveness of C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction remains unexplored in the treatment of AC. This study aimed to investigate whether C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction are more effective than conventional therapy in pain, range of motion(ROM), and disability in patients with AC. The outcome of the study must provide valid information to enhance the prognostic value of adhesive capsulitis.

Detailed description

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is often self-limited but can persist for years and may never fully resolve. The most effective treatment for adhesive capsulitis is uncertain till date. Though neurological control of the shoulder girdle muscles is mainly from cervical roots, particularly from C5/C6 roots, there was not sufficient research to associate this link with AC. Evidence confirms that there is an association between posture and shoulder mobility. However, the effectiveness of C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction remains unexplored in the treatment of AC. We aimed to investigate whether C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction are more effective than conventional therapy in pain, range of motion(ROM), and disability in patients with AC. Methods The protocol is written according to the SPIRIT statement to enhance transparency of content and completeness. Two-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors. A total of 66 adults with AC will be randomly assigned to experimental group to receive C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction sessions (n=33) and the others(n=33) in control group to receive conventional therapy within a period of 3 weeks. Primary outcomes are Shoulder Pain, range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint and Disability Index (SPADI) were to be measured at pre, postintervention following 3 weeks and 3 months..

Interventions

OTHERSpinal Manual therapy used in Physiotherapy Practice

C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction

Sponsors

Gulf Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A two-group, parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
27 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with AC & a Positive for Apley's scratch test. * Adhesive capsulitis (with symptoms for at least three months and less than 12 months\[18\] * Both Gender * Age 27-70 * Sleep-disturbing night pain

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unwilling to participate * patients with malignancy * AC Secondary to fracture and uncontrolled hypertension. * Unstable cardiac conditions * Patient with neurological conditions * Patient with reported concurrent cervical issues

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motion of shoulder1 YearThe smartphone clinometer (Plaincode Software Solutions) is readily available at low cost for several smartphones, including the iPhone, which will be used by all examiners in this study
SPADY scale1 YearIn the original version, the patient was instructed to place a mark on the VAS for each item that best represented their experience of their shoulder problem over the last week \[26\]. Each subscale is summed and transformed to a score out of 100. A mean is taken of the two subscales to give a total score out of 100, a higher score indicating greater impairment or disability.
Cervical Range of motion1 YearClinometer app on smartphones is a reliable and valid device for assessing cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. The results from the study demonstrated moderate to excellent (ICC = .87-.96) concurrent validity in all 6 cervical movements when compared with the universal goniometric measurements

Countries

United Arab Emirates

Contacts

Primary ContactWatson Arulsingh D R, PhD
dr.watson@gmu.ac.ae+971505708763
Backup ContactRania Zaarour
dr.rania@gmu.ac.ae+971 6 7431333

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 15, 2026