Skip to content

The Role of Verapamil in Radial Artery Spasm

The Role of Oral Verapamil in Preventing Radial Spasm During Transradial Angiography

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06447688
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-06-07
Start date
2024-06-05
Completion date
2024-11-15
Last updated
2025-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radial Artery Spasm

Keywords

radial artery spasm, verapamil, transradial access

Brief summary

Coronary angiography (CAG) is an invasive imaging method performed to determine the degree of coronary artery disease. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is one of the most common complications during coronary angiography performed via the transradial approach, causing patient discomfort or sometimes interrupting the procedure. There are many studies on RAS, and various pharmacoagents administered intravenously (intraarterial) to prevent RAS have been described. However, there is limited data in the literature regarding oral pharmacoagents that will prevent this complication. In our study, the preventive effect of Verapamil, given orally 2 hours before coronary angiography, on radial artery spasm will be investigated.

Detailed description

Transradial access (TRA) has emerged as the preferred modality for vascular access in coronary interventions worldwide, prompting growing interest in its potential applications across other interventional specialties, especially in neurovascular procedures. Radial artery spasm (RAS) remains the most common complication of TRA, often causing procedural difficulties, patient discomfort, and an increased risk of access site crossover. The incidence of radial artery spasm reported in the literature varies widely, with estimates ranging from 4% to over 51.3%, influenced by factors such as definitions, patient selection, and the operator's experience. After puncturing the radial artery (Puncture-induced RAS) and inserting the sheath-but before administering intra-arterial spasmolytics-local discomfort and pain may trigger a sympathetic vasoconstrictive response, potentially leading to the onset of RAS. A previous study has stated that preventing RAS is more effective than treating it after it has been established. In this context, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of 120 mg of oral verapamil administered two hours before radial artery puncture in reducing the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS)

Interventions

DRUGVerapamil

Prevent

Sponsors

Mersin Medicalpark Hastanesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who undergo daily coronary angiography * Whose Allen test is normal. * Must be able to swallow tablets

Exclusion criteria

* Allen test results are distorted, * No pulse in the radial artery, * Patients who have previously undergone radial angiography and whose hemodynamics are compromised will be excluded from the study. * Patients with known contraindications to verapamil (significant aortic stenosis, heart rate \<50/min, high-grade atrioventricular block, myocardial infarction) complicated with cardiogenic shock, or left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Radial Artery Spasm (RAS)During the coronary angiography procedure (up to 2 hours from sheath insertion)Clinical RAS defined as presence of at least 2 of the following: (1) forearm pain ≥ 4/10, (2) pain during catheter manipulation, (3) catheter movement restriction, (4) pain during sheath removal, (5) difficulty in sheath removal.
Number of Participants With Ultrasonographically Confirmed Radial Artery Spasm (Ultrasonographic RAS)During the procedure, immediately after catheterization (within 2 hours)Radial artery spasm (RAS) was defined as luminal narrowing of ≥50% as measured by ultrasonography at the access site.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Procedural SuccessDuring the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)Procedure success was defined as completing coronary angiography or PCI using the initial radial artery approach without requiring a switch to an alternative access site.
Mean Volume of Contrast Media Used (mL) (mL)During the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)The volume of contrast media (in ml) used was recorded
Mean of the Dose Area Product (DAP)During the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)The parameters collected for radiation exposure included the DAP
Mean of the Fluoroscopy TimeDuring the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)The parameters collected for radiation exposure included the fluoroscopy time (in minutes)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All consecutive patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography between June-November 2024 at Medicalpark Hospital (Mersin, Turkey) were included. Exclusion criteria were abnormal Allen test, absent radial pulse, prior radial access, hemodynamic instability, or contraindications to verapamil (e.g., severe AS, HR \<50, high-grade AV block, cardiogenic shock, EF \<35%).

Pre-assignment details

No pre-assignment washout or run-in period was required. All eligible participants were randomized immediately after enrollment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants did not receive any prophylactic medication to prevent radial artery spasm and underwent standard transradial coronary angiography.
75
Verapamil
Participants received a single oral dose of verapamil (120 mg) approximately 2 hours before transradial coronary angiography as prophylaxis against radial artery spasm.
75
Total150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVerapamilTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
75 Participants150 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants49 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants101 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 750 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 750 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 750 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Radial Artery Spasm (RAS)

Clinical RAS defined as presence of at least 2 of the following: (1) forearm pain ≥ 4/10, (2) pain during catheter manipulation, (3) catheter movement restriction, (4) pain during sheath removal, (5) difficulty in sheath removal.

Time frame: During the coronary angiography procedure (up to 2 hours from sheath insertion)

Population: All randomized participants were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Radial Artery Spasm (RAS)23 participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With Clinical Radial Artery Spasm (RAS)3 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Ultrasonographically Confirmed Radial Artery Spasm (Ultrasonographic RAS)

Radial artery spasm (RAS) was defined as luminal narrowing of ≥50% as measured by ultrasonography at the access site.

Time frame: During the procedure, immediately after catheterization (within 2 hours)

Population: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (75 in the placebo group and 75 in the oral verapamil group)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Ultrasonographically Confirmed Radial Artery Spasm (Ultrasonographic RAS)36 participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With Ultrasonographically Confirmed Radial Artery Spasm (Ultrasonographic RAS)8 participants
Secondary

Mean of the Dose Area Product (DAP)

The parameters collected for radiation exposure included the DAP

Time frame: During the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)

Population: All randomized participants were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean of the Dose Area Product (DAP)873.9 Gy·cm2Standard Deviation 732.3
VerapamilMean of the Dose Area Product (DAP)878.8 Gy·cm2Standard Deviation 736.7
Secondary

Mean of the Fluoroscopy Time

The parameters collected for radiation exposure included the fluoroscopy time (in minutes)

Time frame: During the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)

Population: All randomized participants were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean of the Fluoroscopy Time7.9 minuteStandard Deviation 7.3
VerapamilMean of the Fluoroscopy Time6.9 minuteStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Mean Volume of Contrast Media Used (mL) (mL)

The volume of contrast media (in ml) used was recorded

Time frame: During the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)

Population: All randomized participants were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Volume of Contrast Media Used (mL) (mL)133.8 Milliliters (mL)Standard Deviation 71.9
VerapamilMean Volume of Contrast Media Used (mL) (mL)136.4 Milliliters (mL)Standard Deviation 78.3
Secondary

Number of Participants With Procedural Success

Procedure success was defined as completing coronary angiography or PCI using the initial radial artery approach without requiring a switch to an alternative access site.

Time frame: During the procedure (from sheath insertion to procedure completion)

Population: All randomized participants were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Procedural Success75 participants
VerapamilNumber of Participants With Procedural Success75 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026