Skip to content

Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Hyaluronic Acid vs. Hyaluronic Acid Injection for TMJ Internal Derangement

Assessment of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin With Hyaluronic Acid Versus Hyaluronic Acid in Management of Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06446843
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-06-06
Start date
2024-09-18
Completion date
2025-04-01
Last updated
2025-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Internal Derangement

Keywords

Hyaluronic acid, Injectable PRF, TMJ Internal derangement, Temporomandibular joint

Brief summary

Injectable PRF technology, according to literature evidence, ensures the release of growth factors over time which play a major role in the release of regenerative factors for tissue repair after injection, while HA is an anti-inflammatory medication that can provide rapid relief from pain and inflammation in joints. It is a major natural component of synovial fluid that plays an important role in lubrication of synovial tissues However, its effect is typically temporary, and it doesn't promote tissue healing or regeneration. For this reason, this protocol has been designed with the aim to investigate whether injection in the injection i- pRF with HA can achieve the same improvements of pain and function, compare this technique with arthrocentesis.

Detailed description

One group will receive arthrocentesis only, the second group will receive 1 mm hyaluronic acid injection and the third group will receive a mixture of 1 ml hyaluronic acid, 1 ml of injectable PRF

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCT(Arthrocentesis followed by i-PRF +HA)

Intra-articular I-PRF with HA will be injected in the joint,1 ml of I-PRF will be injected inside the joint, Then from 25mg/ml of HA , 1ml will be injected into the superior joint space

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of TMJ-ID related symptoms. * Patients suffering from TMJ internal derangement (disc displacement with reduction). * Age limit between 20 and 45years so Patient less than 21years will need assent form …as well as written informed consent from the parents \\guardians. * No previous TMJ surgical procedures * Acquisition of informed consent. * Cooperative patient * Patients free from any systemic disease that may affect the procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous malignant head and neck neoplasms. * Patients suffering from inflammatory or connective tissue systemic diseases. * Neurologic disorders. * History of bony or fibrous adhesion * Gross mechanical restrictions and condylar fractures, previous TMJ surgery, TMJ ankylosis, or acute infection. * Patients maintained on anti-coagulants, muscle relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 48 h preoperatively, corticosteroid injection at treatment site within one month or systemic use of corticosteroids within 2 weeks was also excluded in this study. * Uncooperative patient * Pregnant and lactating female. * Patients with systemic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or juvenile arthritis), and those who had shown symptoms of hypersensitivity to the HA solution.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain intensity at TMJ during spontaneous mouth opening and with articular palpation and forced openingevaluated at the preoperative examination (baseline) and reassessed at follow-up evaluation at 1 month, 3, month, and 6 months after the procedure.Pain measured through a (10 scale) visual analogue scale (VAS)
Maximum mouth openingevaluated at the preoperative examination (baseline) and reassessed at follow-up evaluation at 1 month, 3, month, and 6 months after the procedure.mandibular mouth opening defined as MIO (maximum interincisal opening) \>/35

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRI disc angle changespreoperative examination (baseline) and 6 months after the procedure.MRI unit :degree of angle between the posterior margin of the disc and the vertical line drawn through the Centre of the condyle.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026