Skip to content

Telerehabilitation-based Exercises vs Standard Home-based Exercise in Low Back Pain

Effect of the Implementation of Telerehabilitation-based Exercises Compared to the Standard Use of Exercise Dossier and Intervention Diary in a Home Therapeutic Exercise Intervention in Patients With Low Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06446596
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-06-06
Start date
2024-11-04
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, exercise, telerehabilitation

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to compare the effect of a telerehabilitation-based exercise program, versus a home therapeutic exercise program scheduled through a dossier and an exercise diary, with respect to disability (measured using the OSWESTRY questionnaire) and other variables (range of motion, strength, fatigue, histological changes, pain, medication intake, psychosocial factors and adherence), in patients with low back pain.

Detailed description

The objective of the study is to compare the effect of a telerehabilitation-based exercise program, versus a home therapeutic exercise program scheduled through a dossier and an exercise diary, with respect to disability (measured using the OSWESTRY questionnaire) and other variables (range of motion, strength, fatigue, histological changes, pain, medication intake, psychosocial factors and adherence), in patients with low back pain. This randomized controlled trial has a parallel design, with two groups. Both groups will complete an 8-week home exercise program that includes flexibility and strength exercises. The program will be carried out with a frequency of 3 weekly sessions, preferably on alternate days. In the case of the experimental group, the program will be carried out with the support of the TRAK computer tool (https://www.trakphysio.com/es/), which allows the exercises to be carried out in front of a camera that, with the help of an artificial intelligence system, offers feedback to the participant and allows investigators/clinicians to keep a record of the sessions. In the case of the control group, the program will be carried out with the support of an information dossier of the exercises to be performed and a monitoring diary in which everything related to the sessions carried out will be noted. In both groups, as an addition to the home sessions, two face-to-face sessions will be held in the first and fifth weeks, respectively. The exercise program includes flexibility and strength exercises, each made up of three levels of difficulty (easy, intermediate and difficult), with patients advancing to subsequent levels once each level is successfully overcome.

Interventions

8 week home therapeutic exercise program that includes flexibility and strength exercises scheduled through the software a digital physiotherapy and telerehabilitation. The program will be carried out with a frequency of 3 weekly sessions, preferably on alternate days. The program will be carried out with the support of the TRAK software (https://www.trakphysio.com/es/), which allows the exercises to be carried out in front of a camera that, with the help of an artificial intelligence system, offers feedback to the participant and allows you to keep a record of the sessions. As an addition to the home sessions, two face-to-face sessions will be held in the first and fifth weeks, respectively. The exercise program includes three levels of difficulty (easy, intermediate and difficult), with patients advancing to subsequent levels once each level is successfully overcome.

8 week home therapeutic exercise program that includes flexibility and strength exercises scheduled through a dossier and an exercise diary. The program will be carried out with a frequency of 3 weekly sessions, preferably on alternate days. The program will be carried out with the support of an information dossier of the exercises to be performed and a monitoring diary in which everything related to the sessions carried out will be noted.. As an addition to the home sessions, two face-to-face sessions will be held in the first and fifth weeks, respectively. The exercise program includes three levels of difficulty (easy, intermediate and difficult), with patients advancing to subsequent levels once each level is successfully overcome.

Sponsors

University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Nonspecific subacute or chronic low back pain

Exclusion criteria

* Neuropathic pain * Pain below the knees * Pain in legs with tingling, sensation of current or sensory alterations * Positive neurological tests. Lack of strength, sensitivity or altered reflexes * Canal stenosis * Nociplastic pain (fibromyalgia, generalized pain, emotional lability, affective and cognitive implications) * Previous lumbar surgery * Specific pathology (rheumatic, spondylolisthesis, oncological, fractures...) * Pregnancy * Performing medium-high intensity exercise of more than 100 minutes a week * Pathology that prevents exercise (decompensated cardiac pathology, decompensated respiratory pathology, significant mobility difficulties...) * Lack of digital skills * Visual problems that prevent exercise with the phone screen

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability8 weeks measurement (post intervention)Disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DisabilityBaseline; 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (range score from 0 \[less disability\] to 100 \[more disability\])
Range of movement (Schober score)Baseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Range of movement measured using the modified Schober score (a higher score is an indicator of better range of movement)
Range of movement (Finger floor distance test)Baseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Range of movement measured using the Finger floor distance test (a lower distance is an indicator of better range of movement)
Extensor low back muscle strengthBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Extensor low back muscle strength measured using the Biering-Sorensen test (a higher score is an indicator of better strength)
Muscle thickness (low back extensor muscles)Baseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Muscle thickness (low back extensor muscles) measured using ultrasonography
Muscle thickness (transversus abdominis)Baseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Muscle thickness (transversus abdominis) measured using ultrasonography
Low Back PainBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Mean pain during last week measured with a numerical pain rating scale (range score from 0 \[no pain\] -10 \[worst pain\])
Medication intakeBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Medication intake registered using a diary
KinesiphobiaBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Kinesiofobia measured using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiofobia (range score from 17 \[lower levels of kinesiophobia\]-68 \[higher levels of kinesiophobia\])
DepressionBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Depression measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (range score from 0 \[better status\] to 63 \[severe depression\])
Fear Avoidance BeliefsBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Fear Avoidance Beliefs measured using the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (range score from 0 \[Lower levels of fear-avoidance beliefs\] to 96 \[higher levels of fear-avoidace beliefs\])
Fear Avoidance ComponentsBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Fear Avoidance Beliefs measured using the Fear Avoidance Components Scale (range score from 0 \[Lower levels of fear-avoidance components\] to 100 \[higher levels of fear-avoidace components\])
AdherenceBaseline; 8 weeks measurement (post intervention); 32 weeks measurement (24 weeks post intervention)Adherence measured using the TRAK application

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTRodrigo Martín-San Agustín, PhD
rodrigo.martin@uv.es+34 963 983 853
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRodrigo Martín-San Agustín, PhD

University of Valencia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026