Skip to content

Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) on the Deprescription of Benzodiazepines and Related Substances in Adult Chronic Drug Users

Impact of Identification and Brief Motivational Intervention in Dispensing Pharmacies (BMI) on the Deprescription of Benzodiazepines and Related Substances in Adult Chronic Drug Users

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06446349
Acronym
BENZ_HALTE
Enrollment
300
Registered
2024-06-06
Start date
2024-12-02
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2024-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benzodiazepine Withdrawal

Keywords

substance use disorder, community pharmacy

Brief summary

We hypothesise that a short-term intervention by dispensing pharmacists is feasible and relatively easy to implement, and that it could have an impact on the deprescribing of BZD/Z in adult patients. Two primary objectives will be evaluated in a sequential hierarchical manner, with two primary endpoints analysed one after the other, without alpha risk adjustment, but the second can only be analysed if the null hypothesis is rejected for the first: 1. Evaluate the impact of brief motivational intervention (BMI) on reducing the daily dose of BZD/Z prescribed at 6 months (superiority hypothesis) compared with the usual practice of dispensing BZD/Z in pharmacies. 2. Evaluate the impact of BMI on clinical worsening at 6 months (non-inferiority hypothesis) in comparison with the usual practice of dispensing BZD/Z in pharmacies.

Detailed description

In France, the prevalence of use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and related drugs (Z-drugs: zolpidem, zopiclone) (BZD/Z) was estimated at 13.4% in 2015, and 15% of new users had a first prescription exceeding the legal duration. The increase in prescriptions has continued to grow: in the first 4 months of 2021, an increase of 1.3 million anxiolytic treatments and 580,000 hypnotic treatments was observed, with new prescriptions for these treatments increasing by 15% for anxiolytics and 26% for hypnotics over the same year. The prevalence of long-term (\>6 months) BZD prescriptions varies from country to country between 6% and 15% in the general population, and is estimated to reach 22% to 55% in people aged ≥ 65 years. In France, recommendations and good practice guidelines recommend prescriptions limited to 4 weeks for hypnotic BZD/Z and 12 weeks for anxiolytic BZD. However, a recent study focusing solely on anxiolytic BZDs, carried out in patients covered by the general social security system (excluding special schemes such as self-employed workers, farmers, etc.), showed that 12.2% of women and 9.3% of men aged over 50 were prescribed for longer than the legal duration. All countries agree on the need to limit the length of time these drugs are prescribed because of the rapid inversion of the benefit/risk ratio in the case of prolonged and continuous prescribing (rapid loss of efficacy due to the tolerance effect associated with the occurrence of adverse effects. A number of public health initiatives have been taken in France to reduce the initiation or continued use of long-term BZD/Z prescriptions, including information for healthcare professionals about the risks, pictograms on drug packaging, directives from the health authorities, incentives offered by the Assurance Maladie and regulatory measures to control prescribing. Alongside these measures, various types of psychosocial intervention are specifically aimed at deprescribing, defined as a clinically supervised process of stopping or reducing the dose of drugs when they cause harm or when the potential risks outweigh the benefits. These strategies have been evaluated for several years, ranging from brief interventions in the form of letters, self-support manuals and targeted consultations, to more complex psychotherapeutic interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or pharmacological interventions. Although complex interventions such as structured educational programmes or 3rd wave CBT have been shown to be effective in reducing long-term BZD/Z use, particularly in the elderly, they are often too long and complex to be implemented on a large scale, particularly in primary care, and all the more so in a context of increasing shortage of specialists. Brief interventions, which are both more realistic and functional, have been shown to be effective in reducing and stopping long-term use of BZD/Z at 6 and 12 months post-intervention. At the same time, very few studies have involved the active participation of pharmacy professionals. Yet the involvement of pharmacists would optimise prescribing, and a simple psychoeducation action carried out in pharmacies would have an economic impact. With a view to the shift to ambulatory care centred on the structuring of care pathways, increasing the skills of local pharmacists, as part of a multiprofessional coordination strategy, is a response to the requirements of the law modernising the French healthcare system, while offering a simple and pragmatic intervention model for patients whose prescriptions need to be optimised. In this study, the investigators propose to evaluate the impact of identification combined with a brief motivational intervention in pharmacies (BMI) targeting the deprescription of BZD/Z in adult patients with long-term prescriptions (≥ 6 months).

Interventions

identification followed by a brief motivational intervention in pharmacies (BMI) based on the mobilisation of patients' psychosocial skills and the integration of tools to help reduce consumption of BZD/Z prescribed over the long term (≥ 6 months).

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Brief motivational intervention in community pharmacy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Continuous treatment (at least once daily) with BZD/Z for at least 6 months, after verification of 6 months' supply. * Signed informed consent * Patient able to understand the survey and complete a questionnaire in French. * Affiliation with the French social security system

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant treatment with: * The following oral antipsychotics: risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine, clozapine, haloperidol, flupentixol, pimozide, chlorpromazine, sulpiride, zuclopenthixol, loxapine, cyamemazine (\>100mg/D), sulpiride (\>150mg/D), * Injectable medium- and long-acting antipsychotics * Thymoregulatory treatment with lithium * Treatments for alcohol use disorders: baclofen, nalmefene, naltrexone, acamprosate, disulfiram * Opiate substitution treatments: buprenorphine, methadone * Anti-epileptic drugs * History of convulsions or epilepsy * History of gabaergic withdrawal accidents: delirium tremens, confusional syndrome requiring specialist treatment (hospitalisation, specialist consultation), epileptic seizures, etc. * Patients suffering from cancer * Persons referred to in articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (corresponding to all protected persons: pregnant women, women in childbirth, nursing mothers, persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons subject to a legal protection measure).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of the Daily dose of BZD/Z drug6 monthsChange of at least 50% of the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) initially prescribed (reduction), 6 months after the BPMI (during the last 4 weeks prior to the assessment)
Worsening of the clinical symptoms of anxiety and/or sleep disorders6 monthsClinical worsening is defined as: * An increase in anxiety ≥ 3 points of the HAD-A sub-score (the minimum clinically significant difference being estimated at 3.2 +/- 4. * and/or an increase ≥ 8 points in the ISI (the minimum difference corresponding to a moderate improvement being estimated at \> 7 points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change of the prescribed daily dose of BZD/Z without clinical worsening (superiority hypothesis) compared with the usual practice of dispensing BZD/Z in pharmacies12 months1\. Proportion of patients with a change (reduction) of at least 50% of the initially prescribed Defined Daily Dose (DDD), without clinical worsening, during the last 4 weeks prior to assessment.
complete cessation of BZD/Z prescriptions without clinical worsening (superiority hypothesis) compared with the usual practice of dispensing BZD/Z in pharmacies6 months and 12 monthsProportion of patients whose BZD/Z prescription was stopped, without clinical worsening. Discontinuation is defined as no prescriptions or dispensing identified in the last 4 weeks prior to assessment.
declared consumption compared with the usual practice of dispensing BZD/Z in pharmacies6 months and 12 monthsdeclared average daily dose consumed and the number of days without consumption during the 7 days preceding the patient's visit
anxiety symptoms12 monthsWorsening of anxiety at 12 months is considered to be an increase in anxiety ≥ 3 points on the Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD-A sub-score). HAD-A is from 0 (no anxiety) to 21(max of anxiety)
depressive symptoms6 and 12 monthsA worsening of depression is considered to be an increase in depression ≥ 4 points on the Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD-D sub-score). HAD-D is from 0 (no depression) to 21 (max of depression)
Worsening of severity of insomnia12 monthsA worsening of insomnia is considered to be an increase in insomnia ≥ 8 points on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). the score varies from 0 (no insomnia) to 21 (max of insomnia)
transfers to other addictive products or behaviours6 and 12 monthsEvaluation of transfers to addictive products and/or behaviours on the drugs version of the Addictive Behaviour Intensity Questionnaire (QMICA). The score varies from 0 (no addictive behaviour) to 210 (max of addictive behaviour)
misuse of BZD/Z6 and 12 monthsAssessment of misuse of BZD/Z. In the absence of a questionnaire specifically evaluating the misuse of benzodiazepine drugs, the evaluation is carried out in the form of open questions.
Adverse events description3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsDescription of all adverse events reported by patients during study follow-up. Specific monitoring of known severe adverse events related to the reduction in BZD/Z consumption, as well as falls, is carried out.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLucie Pennel, MD, PhD
LPennel@chu-grenoble.fr+33 670 386 149
Backup ContactAdeline PARIS, PharmD, PhD
aparis@chu-grenoble.fr+334 767 767 383

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026