Skip to content

Generational Diversity in the Medical Profession

Investigating the Experiences of Generational Diversity Within the Medical Profession of the National Health Service: An Exploratory Study Amongst Post-Graduate Doctors in Training

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06446297
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-06-06
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2025-02-01
Last updated
2024-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generation Gap, Generations, Intergenerational Relations

Keywords

Generation, Generation Gap, Generational Diversity, Intergenerational workforce

Brief summary

The purpose of this work is to investigate how post-graduate doctors in training (PGDiTs) experience generational diversity with their colleagues in the workplace. The investigators want to explore and understand how PGDiTs perceive and experience generational diversity in the workplace and look into where these differences between generations could come from. The research team wants to do this by running focus groups. These focus groups would be made up of PGDiTs that are working within one hospital. The doctors will be split into the different generations (i.e. generation X, Y and Z). A set list of questions will be used to prompt and guide the focus group conversations. Each focus group will be audio-recorded using an electronic device and then analysed with the aid of computer software. The investigators will then generate themes from the data and use this to create an overall story of the data. It is hoped that this research can help inform supervisors and employers of the impact of generational diversity on on PGDiTs. This may be used to help develop ways of improving working relationships for PGDiTs with their supervisors and employers.

Detailed description

The different generations and the differences between them has provided considerable interest within the media, organisations and academia. A new generation entering the workforce often prompts new conversations about the differences between all generations. Investigating these generational differences has been attempted with mixed levels of success. Some organisations have made suggestions to overcome these generational differences and improve the workplace environment. The National Health Service (NHS) is one of the largest organisations in England, but very limited research investigating generational differences in the NHS has been done. Post-graduate doctors in training (PGDiTs) are doctors working in recognised training schemes in the NHS. These doctors range from newly qualified doctors working in the Foundation Year training scheme to doctors with over a decade of experience working in their specialist areas. The last two decades have witnessed a number of changes to these doctors' working lives, some positive and some negative. The impact of generational diversity amongst these doctors has not been looked at. These doctors are likely to experience generational diversity with their supervisors, who may have completed training several years previously. Research Question and Objectives: The investigators want to answer the question: how do PGDiTs experiences generational diversity in an NHS hospital? The objectives are to explore and understand the concept, perceptions, experiences and sources of generational diversity of PGDiTs working in the NHS. Study Design: This study will involve the use of qualitative semi-structured face-to-face focus groups to explore and understand the concept, perceptions, experiences and sources of generational differences amongst PGDiTs. The focus groups will be stratified according to the generational cohorts of the participants. The study methodology supporting our study design is pragmatic with components of grounded theory and interpretative phenomenological analysis being used. Inductive thematic analysis will be used as our method of data analysis. Contingency arrangements are also available for certain situations. In the event that face-to-face group meetings are not practically possible due to logistical reasons then virtual meetings will be arranged. If insufficient numbers of participants are recruited to conduct focus groups then semi-structured interviews will be conducted. The consent process has been directed by the HRA's consent and participation guidance. Prior to participating in the study, all participants must electronically agree via email. All potential participants will receive an electronic copy of the informed consent form and participant information sheet (PIS) and be provided with an opportunity to ask any question of the research team. This opportunity for questions can occur via phone call, email or as a face-to-face meeting. Participants will be asked via email to confirm their participation in the research study and willingness to complete the consent form. On the day of the focus group, each participant will be provided with a printed version of the informed consent form and asked to complete it. Data analysis: Each focus group will be directed primarily by the interview schedule. Each focus group will be electronically audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed. Data analysis will be conducted using thematic analysis with the generation of codes and themes. Data analysis software will be used for thematic analysis.

Interventions

OTHERFocus Group.

Participants in each focus group will attend a face-to-face (or virtual) meeting that lasts approximately 90 minutes. This will be composed of a briefing period, interview period supported and guided by an interview schedule and finishing with a debrief period. The same process will be followed if individual semi-structured interviews are undertaken.

Sponsors

University of Plymouth
CollaboratorOTHER
Health Education England, Wessex
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The following criteria must all be met to permit inclusion in the research study: * Any medically qualified healthcare professional with a General Medical Council (GMC) registration number, AND * Currently working in a recognised training programme in the Southwest (i.e. foundation year training, integrated medical training, core surgical training, acute care common stem training, higher specialty training), AND * Currently based at University Hospitals Plymouth (UHP), AND * Consents to being interviewed and recorded for the purposes of the study. An individual will be excluded from the study if any of the following criteria are met: * Any medically qualified professional with a GMC registration number that is not currently enrolled within a recognised training programme at UHP, OR * any medical professional working outside of UHP, OR * employed as an Allied Health Professional, Advanced Clinical Practitioner, Advanced Critical Care Practitioner or Physician Associate will not be eligible for inclusion in the study, OR * any individual eligible for inclusion into the study that does NOT consent to being interviewed OR recorded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thematic Analysis4 months.Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using thematic analysis to generate a number of codes and themes from the transcripts generated from focus groups and semi-structured interviews.

Contacts

Primary ContactMatthew A Boissaud-Cooke, MBChB MRCS
matthew.boissaud-cooke@nhs.net01752437339
Backup ContactJane Thurlow, MBChB FRCA
jane.thurlow@nhs.net

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026