Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
community health worker
Brief summary
This study is to determine if hypertension management by community health workers (CHW) supported by a mobile health application and remote physician supervision is non-inferior to management by a physician for the primary outcome of improvement in systolic blood pressure. The target population is patients with hypertension in rural Guatemala. Study duration will be 12-24 months.
Detailed description
The investigators have developed an innovative system of care utilizing CHWs equipped with a mobile application and supported and supervised remotely by physicians. This model of care is adapted from a CHW-led diabetes program enabled by a similar CDS application which the investigators implemented in the same communities in rural Guatemala where we will carry out this proposed study. This program safely led to significant improvements in glycemic control. The mobile application is built on the widely-used CommCare platform and provides clinical decision support (CDS) to CHWs based on protocols from the WHO and the International Society of Hypertension for antihypertensive medication initiation and titration, lifestyle counseling, and identification of patients requiring a higher level of care. The Primary Objective is to determine if hypertension management by CHWs is non-inferior to care provided directly by a physician. The Secondary Objective is to evaluate the safety, acceptability to patients, and cost of CHW-led care compared to care provided directly by a physician.
Interventions
For those assigned to the CHW arm, management will be assisted by CDS from the CommCare application.
teleconsultation with a supervising physician
The physician will have received training and orientation on the same clinical protocols followed by the CHWs, as well as access to reference materials for these protocols, but the version of the CommCare application used will not provide CDS, but will serve to record and review patient data only.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
cluster randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial, each of 15 clusters of geographically grouped communities in the San Lucas Toliman municipality of Guatemala will be randomized to either CHW or physician care
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults age 18 or greater with diagnosis of hypertension AND blood pressure (BP) greater than or equal to 140/90 OR currently taking antihypertensive medication. * Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy * Severe comorbid condition(s) with life expectancy less than 1 year
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants with SBP less than 140mmHg | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Proportion of Participants with SBP less than their personalized goal | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Diabetes Control | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | Indicated by the proportion of diabetic patients with HbA1c less than 8 and the proportion of diabetic patients with HbA1c less than their personalized goal. |
| Change in Weight | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Total Cholesterol | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in LDL Cholesterol | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in HDL Cholesterol | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Triglycerides | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Creatinine | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in 10 year CVD risk (per WHO risk prediction charts) | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | — |
| Change in Hypertension Self-Care Activity Level Effects (H-SCALE): Medication Adherence Subscale Score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | The H-SCALE: Medication Adherence subscale is scored from 0-21 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward adherence. |
| Change in H-SCALE: Weight Management Score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | The H-SCALE: Weight Management subscale is scored from 9-45 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward weight management. |
| Change in H-SCALE: Physical Exercise Score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | The H-SCALE: Physical Exercise subscale is scored from 0-14 where higher scores indicate a more positive behavior toward physical exercise. |
| Change in H-SCALE: Smoking Exposure Score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | The H-SCALE: Smoking Exposure subscale is scored from 0-14 where a score of 0 indicates a more positive attitude toward smoking exposure. |
| Change in H-SCALE: Alcohol Intake Score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | The H-SCALE: Alcohol Intake subscale contains three questions and is scored as abstainer (does not drink) or non-adherent (reported drinking alcohol). |
| Change in H-SCALE: Healthy Eating Plan Score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | The H-SCALE: Healthy Eating Plan subscale is scored from 0-70 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward healthy eating. |
| Change in selected items from the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | PACIC will be scored on a likert scale from 1-5 (almost never to almost always) where higher scores indicate better assessment of chronic illness care. |
| Change in global hypertension care satisfaction score | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | Scored from 1-5 where higher scores indicate less satisfaction with hypertension care. |
| Change in pill count adherence ratio (PCAR) | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | PCAR is the total number of doses dispensed less that total doses missed divided by the total doses dispensed. |
| Change in self-reported adherence | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months) | Self-reported adherence is rated on a five point scale of how often patients are taking their medications as directed, from "less than half the time" to "100% of the time". |
| Proportion of lifestyle knowledge questions answered correctly | through study completion, an average of 12 months | The proportion of a set of true-false or multiple choice questions developed for this study to assess hypertension-related lifestyle knowledge answered correctly |
Countries
Guatemala
Contacts
University of Wisconsin, Madison