Skip to content

Community Health Worker-led Hypertension Management

Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Community Health Worker-led Hypertension Management Enabled by a Mobile Clinical Decision Support Application Compared to Physician Care: a Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06444308
Enrollment
460
Registered
2024-06-05
Start date
2024-09-09
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

community health worker

Brief summary

This study is to determine if hypertension management by community health workers (CHW) supported by a mobile health application and remote physician supervision is non-inferior to management by a physician for the primary outcome of improvement in systolic blood pressure. The target population is patients with hypertension in rural Guatemala. Study duration will be 12-24 months.

Detailed description

The investigators have developed an innovative system of care utilizing CHWs equipped with a mobile application and supported and supervised remotely by physicians. This model of care is adapted from a CHW-led diabetes program enabled by a similar CDS application which the investigators implemented in the same communities in rural Guatemala where we will carry out this proposed study. This program safely led to significant improvements in glycemic control. The mobile application is built on the widely-used CommCare platform and provides clinical decision support (CDS) to CHWs based on protocols from the WHO and the International Society of Hypertension for antihypertensive medication initiation and titration, lifestyle counseling, and identification of patients requiring a higher level of care. The Primary Objective is to determine if hypertension management by CHWs is non-inferior to care provided directly by a physician. The Secondary Objective is to evaluate the safety, acceptability to patients, and cost of CHW-led care compared to care provided directly by a physician.

Interventions

OTHERCommCare with Mobile Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Application

For those assigned to the CHW arm, management will be assisted by CDS from the CommCare application.

OTHERRemote Supervision by Physicians

teleconsultation with a supervising physician

OTHERCommCare Application without CDS

The physician will have received training and orientation on the same clinical protocols followed by the CHWs, as well as access to reference materials for these protocols, but the version of the CommCare application used will not provide CDS, but will serve to record and review patient data only.

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

cluster randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial, each of 15 clusters of geographically grouped communities in the San Lucas Toliman municipality of Guatemala will be randomized to either CHW or physician care

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults age 18 or greater with diagnosis of hypertension AND blood pressure (BP) greater than or equal to 140/90 OR currently taking antihypertensive medication. * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Severe comorbid condition(s) with life expectancy less than 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants with SBP less than 140mmHgBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Proportion of Participants with SBP less than their personalized goalBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in Diabetes ControlBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)Indicated by the proportion of diabetic patients with HbA1c less than 8 and the proportion of diabetic patients with HbA1c less than their personalized goal.
Change in WeightBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in Total CholesterolBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in LDL CholesterolBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in HDL CholesterolBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in TriglyceridesBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in CreatinineBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in 10 year CVD risk (per WHO risk prediction charts)Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Change in Hypertension Self-Care Activity Level Effects (H-SCALE): Medication Adherence Subscale ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)The H-SCALE: Medication Adherence subscale is scored from 0-21 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward adherence.
Change in H-SCALE: Weight Management ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)The H-SCALE: Weight Management subscale is scored from 9-45 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward weight management.
Change in H-SCALE: Physical Exercise ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)The H-SCALE: Physical Exercise subscale is scored from 0-14 where higher scores indicate a more positive behavior toward physical exercise.
Change in H-SCALE: Smoking Exposure ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)The H-SCALE: Smoking Exposure subscale is scored from 0-14 where a score of 0 indicates a more positive attitude toward smoking exposure.
Change in H-SCALE: Alcohol Intake ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)The H-SCALE: Alcohol Intake subscale contains three questions and is scored as abstainer (does not drink) or non-adherent (reported drinking alcohol).
Change in H-SCALE: Healthy Eating Plan ScoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)The H-SCALE: Healthy Eating Plan subscale is scored from 0-70 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward healthy eating.
Change in selected items from the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) surveyBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)PACIC will be scored on a likert scale from 1-5 (almost never to almost always) where higher scores indicate better assessment of chronic illness care.
Change in global hypertension care satisfaction scoreBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)Scored from 1-5 where higher scores indicate less satisfaction with hypertension care.
Change in pill count adherence ratio (PCAR)Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)PCAR is the total number of doses dispensed less that total doses missed divided by the total doses dispensed.
Change in self-reported adherenceBaseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)Self-reported adherence is rated on a five point scale of how often patients are taking their medications as directed, from "less than half the time" to "100% of the time".
Proportion of lifestyle knowledge questions answered correctlythrough study completion, an average of 12 monthsThe proportion of a set of true-false or multiple choice questions developed for this study to assess hypertension-related lifestyle knowledge answered correctly

Countries

Guatemala

Contacts

CONTACTSean Duffy, MD
sean.duffy@fammed.wisc.edu608-354-7930
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSean Duffy, MD

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026