Skip to content

Effect of Intravenous Amantadine Sulphate on Disorders of Consciousness

Effects of Intravenous Amantadine Sulphate on Brain Dynamics and Neurobehavioral Status in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06443827
Acronym
DOC-AMSUL
Enrollment
18
Registered
2024-06-05
Start date
2018-09-15
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amantadine, Consciousness Disorders, Electroencephalography

Keywords

DoC = Disorders of Consciousness, PSD = Power Spectral Density, Amantadine sulphate, EEG

Brief summary

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover (within subjects) study with an A-B-A-B treatment scheme to investigate the neuromodulatory effects of intravenous amantadine sulphate at a single daily dose of 200 mg in patients with disorders of consciousness (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state) by integrating traditional neurobehavioral assessment with spectral analysis of electrocortical activity derived from 64-channel electroencephalography (EEG) recordings.

Detailed description

Research hypothesis Intravenous amantadine sulphate treatment (200 mg) over five days improves consciousness, defined as an increase in CRS-r score of at least 3 points, and changes the band powers of the EEG in patients with disorder of consciousness admitted in a Neurorehabilitation Department.

Interventions

intravenous amantadine sulphate at a single daily dose of 200 mg or physiological saline (0.9% NaCl solution)

Sponsors

Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Blindness about treatment

Intervention model description

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover (within subjects) study with an A-B-A-B treatment scheme, in which placebo (A) and amantadine sulphate (B) intervention sessions alternated weekly in the same patient for a total of four weeks (A1-B1-A2-B2).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Adults with disorders of consciousness due to acquired brain injury classified according to international guidelines based on CRS-R evaluation as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state (UWS/VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) either in the subacute or chronic stage

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years * History of epileptic seizures/status epilepticus * Scalp defects * pregnancy * Severe uncompensated heart failure (NYHA IV) * Atrioventricular block (AV block) second-degree and third-degree * Known bradycardia (below 55 beats/minute) * Known long QT interval (QTc according to Bazett \> 420 ms * History of serious ventricular arrhythmias * Hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia * Impaired renal function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)days 14 and 28Increase in the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score of at least 1 point. The CRS-R consists of 23 items divided into six subscales designed to assess: Auditory (AU), Visual (V), Motor (M), Oromotor/Verbal (O), Communication (C), and Arousal functions (AR). The total score ranges between 0 (worst) and 23 (best). The subscales are composed of hierarchically ordered items; the lowest items (0) represent reflexive activity, while the highest items (4,5,6,3,2,3 points for AU, V, M, O, C respectively) represent cognitively mediated behaviours. We adopted a cut-off score of 8 for distinguish UWS/VS (\<8) from MCS (≥8) in patients induced by amantadine sulphate vs. placebo
EEG band power alpha, beta, theta, deltadays 14 and 28Change in each canonical band power of EEG induced by amantadine sulphate

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
periodic and aperiodic exponents of the average power spectral densitydays 14 and 28Change in periodic and aperiodic exponents of the average power spectral density vs. placebo and vs healthy controls

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026