Skip to content

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Nutraceutical Supplementation in the Treatment of Epicondylitis: a Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Nutraceutical Supplementation in the Treatment of Epicondylitis: a Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06442618
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-06-04
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epicondylitis, Lateral, Epicondylitis of the Elbow, Tennis Elbow

Keywords

Epicondylitis, Extracorporeal ShockWave Treatment (ESWT), Nutraceutical Supplementation, Rehabilitation, Musculoskeletal Disease, Tendinopathy, Tennis Elbow

Brief summary

Lateral epicondylitis is a pathologic condition of the musculotendinous system, characterized by the presence of pain at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus; it is a tendinopathy of the extensor muscles of the forearm, often caused by overuse or repetitive use of the arm, forced extension of the elbow, or direct trauma to the humeral epicondyle. This study evaluated the efficacy of Extracorporeal ShockWave Treatment (ESWT) combined with a supplemental nutraceutical treatment of Hyaluronic Acid, Collagen, Vitamin C, and Manganese, compared with single treatment in patients with lateral epicondylitis in term of improvement in pain, functional capacity, muscle strength, and reduction of inflammation on ultrasound images. A clinical trial was conducted at the U.O.C. of Recovery and Functional Rehabilitation of A.O.U.P. P. Giaccone of Palermo from Marc 2024 to July 2024. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: in group A, n° 5 sessions of focal ESWT were given every six days; in group B, patients took daily for 30 days, supplemental nutraceutical treatment of Hyaluronic Acid, Collagen, Vitamin C, and Manganese; and group C, patients had combined treatment of ESWT (one session every six days for a total of five sessions) and nutraceutical supplementation (one administration per day for one month). All patients were evaluated at enrollment (T0), after one month, at the end of rehabilitation treatment (T1), and at a follow up 30 days after the end of treatment (T2). Researched will compare patients treated with ESWT or with nutraceutical treatment, and patients who had combined treatment to see if there are real differences in term of pain reduction and improved short- and long-term quality of life.

Interventions

OTHERExtracorporeal Shockwave Treatment (Group A)

Each session involved a 1:1 ratio of patient to physiatrist. The treatment modality was explained to the patient preliminarily, and before each session, the patients were clinically evaluated and the location of pain was identified.; so patients were asked to assume a comfortable position, and treatment with focal ESWTs was started as per the ISMST protocol

OTHERNutraceutical Supplementation (Group B)

Participants in Group B performed home therapy with nutraceutical supplementation containing: hyaluronic acid (200 mg), collagen (5,000 mg), manganese (10 mg) and vitamin C (250 mg), daily for 30 days. Patients were advised to shake the compound, before taking, and to store it at room temperature not exceeding 25 °C, in a cool, dry place, away from light and heat sources. The compound is also free of gluten and lactose, so it can be safely administered.

OTHERCombined Treatment (Group C)

Participants in group C were invited to come to our department's outpatient clinics to perform treatment with focal ESWT; they had one session every six days for a total of 5 sessions lasting about 20 minutes each. Patients in this group took also additional nutraceutical therapy; they took a daily supplemental treatment of hyaluronic acid, collagen, vitamin C and manganese for 30 days.

Sponsors

University of Palermo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis; * Ultrasound evidence of inflammatory status of the tendon of the wrist common extensor muscle; * Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T0 ≥ 4; * Pharmacological wash out starting seven days before treatment; * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy; * Already diagnosed or diagnostically defined neoplasms; * Pacemaker wearers; * Coagulation disorders and/or anticoagulant therapy; * Skin lesions and/or local infections; * Tendon injury and/or previous surgery on the wrist extensor tendons; * Cervical myelopathy; * Epilepsy; * Patients with contraindications and/or allergies to the active ingredients of nutracetical supplementation; * Obesity with BMI>30 (kg/m2).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extent of pain: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10)At the time of recruitment (T0) - After 30 day from the start of treatment (T1) - After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2)The NRS is a subjective scale that rates the extend of pain with a score between 0 and 10. a score of 10 corresponds to maximum pain.
Intensity of pain and disability: Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Scale (PRTEE)At the time of recruitment (T0) - After 30 day from the start of treatment (T1) - After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2)This scale consists of 2 parts, namely pain (5 items) and functional activities (10 items). Each item has a score from 0 (no pain or difficulty in performing a task) to 10 (the worst pain or inability to perform a task). The total score is the combined score of the 2 parts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability: Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) QuestionnaireAt the time of recruitment (T0) - After 30 day from the start of treatment (T1) - After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2)This questinnaire is an important assessment tool, based on a district questionnaire, self-completed by the patient that aims to assess upper limb function; it consists of 38 questions, divided into 3 modules investigating different aspects of daily life, work activities, and sports/rehabilitation practices. The 38 items are scored from 1 to 5 (best score 1 and worst score 5) and refer to the patient's ability in the last 7 days
Handgrip strengthAt the time of recruitment (T0) - After 30 day from the start of treatment (T1) - After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2)Handgrip strength was measured using a dynamometer; the patients squeezed the dynamometer maximally for 3 s. Three trials were attempted with 60 s of rest between each, and the average of all 3 grips were recorded.
Thickness of the common extensor tendon (CET)At the time of recruitment (T0) - After 30 day from the start of treatment (T1) - After 30 days from the end of treatment (T2)The thickness of the common extensor tendon (CET) was assessed by ultrasound images.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactGiulia Letizia Mauro
giulia.letiziamauro@unipa.it+39 0916554160

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026