Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus SOX Versus Nivolumab Plus FLOT in Patients With HER2-negative Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus SOX Versus Nivolumab Plus FLOT in Patients With HER2-negative Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Multicentre, Open-Label, Prospective Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06440811
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-06-04
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2025-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, Immune-related Adverse Event

Keywords

neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Nivolumab, SOX, FLOT, locally advanced, HER-negative

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to learn about Safety and efficacy of preoperative adjuvant SOX regimen combined with nivolumab versus FLOT Regimen with nivolumab in HER2-negative Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. The main question it aims to answer are: * Safety and efficacy of preoperative adjuvant SOX regimen combined with nivolumab versus FLOT regimen with nivolumab for the treatment of HER2-negative Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. * Disease-free survival of preoperative adjuvant SOX plus nivolumab and FLOT plus nivolumab for HER2-negative Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. Participants will be divided into two groups to use a FLOT chemotherapy regimen plus nivolumab (one group) and a SOX chemotherapy regimen plus nivolumab (another group). Researchers would compare tumor regression grade, adverse effects and survival benefit of two neoadjuvant regimens.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Xijing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Histopathological confirmation of GC or GEJC. * 2\. Absence of prior anti-tumor treatments, encompassing surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy. * 3\. Age within the range of 18 to 75 years. * 4\. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) score of 0-1. * 5\. Absence of concurrent malignancies. * 6\. For patients with resectable GC, those with locally advanced stage III and IVA were clearly included according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, and there were no unresectable factors. * 7\. Patients with HER-2 negative. * 8\. Basal information such as hematology and pathological histology was complete.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Refusal of surgical resection subsequent to neoadjuvant therapy. * 2\. Receipt of other ICIs during the study period. * 3\. Receipt of corticosteroids during the study period. * 4\. Have received any anti-tumor therapy such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, etc., or have been more than 180 days since the last treatment. * 5\. Confirmed recurrence of GC. * 6\. Hypersensitivity to the study medication. * 7\. Systemic medical conditions contraindicating chemotherapy. * 8\. Psychiatric illnesses contraindicating chemotherapy. * 9\. Acute infections necessitating antibiotic therapy. * 10\. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. * 11\. Metastatic disease. * 12\. Severe malnutrition. * 13\. Active autoimmune disorders. * 14\. Pregnancy or lactation. * 15\. Positive serological test for hepatitis B or C virus infection, * 16\. Untreated central nervous system metastases peripheral neuropathy. * 17\. Severe myelosuppression. * 18\. Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency (Child-Pugh C, estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 mL/min). * 19\. Significant cardiac history. * 20\. Patients with a history of allogeneic organ transplantation. * 21\. History of malignancy within the past 5 years (with the exception of curative, localized cancer). * 22\. Patients with multiple factors affecting oral medication. * 23\. Vaccination within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. * 24\. Patients who have received immune checkpoint inhibitors and develop serious adverse reactions after treatment and need to be permanently disabled. * 25\. The investigator believes that the subject has other serious systemic diseases or other reasons and is not suitable for this clinical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adverse eventFrom the preoperative chemotherapy until the occurrence of adverse events, assessed up to 180 daysadverse event caused by FLOT, SOX or nivolumab treatment, which were coded using the Medical Dictionary Regulatory Activities version 20.1 and adverse event grade according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
tumor regression gradeFrom the surgery to evaluation of tumor regression grade, assessed up to 1 weekResidual tumor components in post-radiotherapy samples and the proportion of fibrosis
disease-free survivalFrom date of diagnosis until the first documented recurrence or death, assessed up to 120 monthsfrom diagnosis to recurrence or death
objective response rateFrom the surgery to evaluation of objective response rate, assessed up to 1 weekobjective response rate defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response to treatment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Duration of responseFrom the first assessment of the tumor as CR or PR to the first assessment of PD (Progressive Disease) or death from any cause, assessed up to 120 months.Duration of response

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026