Hand Injuries, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Burns
Conditions
Keywords
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, hypertrophic scar, burns, hand function, nerve injury
Brief summary
Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns. Researchers have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.
Detailed description
Burns that occur in the hand cause early joint range-of-motion (ROM) limitations and hand muscle weakness that significantly affect quality of life. Hand burns, though restricted to a small total body surface area (TBSA), can have significant functional consequences. Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns. The investigators have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.
Interventions
Those in the ESWT group were asked to select the most hypertrophic and retracting scars for treatment. ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals.
the sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
The outcome measurements and data analyses were performed by a trained and blinded outcome assessor who was not involved in the intervention.
Intervention model description
ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals. As in previous studies, the sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* ≥ 18 years old * had sustained a deep partial-thickness (second-degree) or a full-thickness (third-degree) burn in the right dominant hand, which had been treated with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) after the thermal injury * nerve injury to the hand was confirmed by electromyography * \< 6 months prior to the enrollment
Exclusion criteria
* musculoskeletal diseases (fracture, amputation, rheumatoid arthritis, and degenerative joint diseases) of the hands * acute infection * malignant tumors * coagulopathy * pregnancy * potential for additional skin damage if exposed to ESWT and conventional occupational therapy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) | 12 weeks | self-reported pain severity, ratings ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Jebsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT) | 12 weeks | The JTT consists of seven subtests, each scored on a 0-15-point scale, with higher scores indicating better hand function |
| Grip and pinch strengths | 12 weeks | quantified using a hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument, USA), with higher socres indicating more stronger |
| Scar thickness | 12 weeks | quantified using ultrasonography (128 BW1 US system, Medison, Korea) |
| the total active motion (TAM) scoring system | 12 weeks | range of motion measurement, higher scores indicating better range of motion. For each finger, the maximum angle is 260 degrees and the minimum angle is 260 degrees. |
| Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) | 12 weeks | measured using a Tewameter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany) to evaluate water evaporation. Higher values indicated skin dryness |
| pigmentation | 12 weeks | Mexameter®(MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany) was used to measure the severity of erythema. Higher values indicated redder skin. |
| erythema | 12 weeks | Mexameter®(MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany) was used to measure the melanin levels. Higher values indicated darker. |
Countries
South Korea