Skip to content

The Influence of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions on Root Coverage

The Influence of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions on Root Coverage by Means of Coronally Advanced Flap and a Connective Tissue Graft: A Prospective Cohort Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06438094
Enrollment
15
Registered
2024-05-31
Start date
2024-05-26
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Brief summary

The goal of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the effect of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the outcome of root coverage therapy. The main question it aims to answer is: In gingival recessions associated with NCCLs, characterized by an undetectable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), reconstruction of the CEJ with a cervical composite restoration, prior to root coverage surgery by means of a coronally advanced flap combined with a connective tissue graft (CAF+CTG), provides similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes, as compared to the treatment of gingival recessions associated with NCCLs, characterized by a visible CEJ, with root coverage surgery only, by means of a CAF+CTG. In NCCLs where the CEJ is undetectable (B-type defect), the CEJ will be reconstructed before surgery with a cervical composite restoration mimicking the anatomic features of the contralateral, homologous tooth. CAF+CTG treatment will be performed in all cases. Participants will be assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate clinical, volumetric, and patient-centred outcomes.

Detailed description

In this investigation, a prospective cohort study, several key outcomes will be assessed. First, we seek to determine whether restoring the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) in Class B GRs before root coverage therapy yields comparable clinical and volumetric outcomes to Class A GRs with detectable CEJ. In addition, the influence of the CEJ restoration on dentin sensitivity and aesthetic satisfaction of the patient will be investigated. To our knowledge, it will be the first clinical study to use Pini Prato et al.'s surface discrepancy classification as a decision-making tool to guide periodontal-restorative procedures.

Interventions

PROCEDURERoot coverage surgery by means of a coronally advanced flap combined with a connective tissue graft

A root coverage surgery will be performed using Zucchelli et al.'s coronally advanced flap combined with a connective tissue graft from the palate.

PROCEDUREReconstruction of the CEJ with a composite restoration followed by root coverage surgery by means of a coronally advanced flap combined with a connective tissue graft

Reconstruction of the CEJ with a composite restoration will be performed in B+ and B- defects prior to root coverage surgery. A root coverage surgery will be performed using Zucchelli et al.'s coronally advanced flap combined with a connective tissue graft from the palate.

Sponsors

Gonzalo Blasi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

There are two treatments but they are based on the tooth-level

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy individuals older than 18 years old; * Healthy periodontal status according to the AAP/EFP definition; * Full-mouth plaque (FMPS) and bleeding scores (FMBS) ≤ 20%; * At least one facial RT1 GR in single-rooted teeth with a minimum depth of 2 mm, associated with a NCCL; * No history of periodontal surgery at the experimental site(s).

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation; * Self-reported smoking ≥10 cigarettes/day; * Metabolic diseases that negatively affect soft tissue healing (i.e., diabetes mellitus); * Any medication that may interfere with wound healing; * Prosthetic crown at experimental teeth; * Ongoing orthodontic therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Root Coverage (MRC)6 monthsMean root coverage assessed in percentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Root Coverage (CRC)6 monthsComplete Root Coverage assessed in percentage
Change in keratinized tissue width (ΔKTW)6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsChange in keratinized tissue width assessed digitally in mm
Change in marginal gingival thickness (ΔMGT)6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsChange in marginal gingival thickness assessed at 1, 2, and 3 mm from the gingival margin in mm
Change in recession depth (ΔRD)6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsChange in recession depth assessed digitally in mm
Change in recession area (ΔRA)6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthschange in recession area assessed digitally in mm\^2
Change in mucosal volume (ΔMV)6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthschange in mucosal volume assessed digitally in mm\^3
Probing pocket depth (PPD)6 monthsprobing pocket depth assessed clinically in mm using a periodontal probe
Clinical attachment level (CAL)6 monthsClinical attachment level assessed clinically in mm (sum of probing pocket depth and recession)
Dentin sensitivity as assessed by VAS (Visual Analog Scale)Initial, 6 monthsDentin sensitivity assessed on each tooth after directing an air blast from a triple syringe at the buccal cervical areas, maintaining a distance of 1 cm for 5 seconds, using a Visual Analog Scale \[0-100\]
Patient aesthetic satisfaction as assessed by VAS (Visual Analog Scale)6 monthsPatient aesthetic satisfaction assessed using a Visual Analog Scale \[0-100\]

Countries

Spain

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORGonzalo Blasi

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJosé Nart

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026