Skip to content

High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery

Postoperative Recovery After Cardiac Surgery A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06437886
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-05-31
Start date
2024-04-22
Completion date
2024-07-22
Last updated
2024-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Surgery Patients

Brief summary

BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, high-dose opioid contributes to adverse events associated with poor postoperative outcomes. There is growing evidence that nerve block-based multi-modal anesthesia protocols may reduce intraoperative opioid consumption without compromising analgesia management and consequently improve patient's early postoperative recovery. OBJECTIVE To determine whether opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block could improve early postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 45 to 70 years undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block (intervention group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72h after surgery, postoperative pain score, the incidence of postoperative adverse events and chronic pain. Other outcomes included endotracheal intubation duration, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.

Interventions

Patients in the OSA group was administrated with 0.5 to 1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and received PIFB combined with RSB after anesthetic induction. Patients in the control group were recommended to receive 2 to 3 mcg·kg-1 opioid-based sufentanil. PIFB was conducted at the T2 to T5 levels under ultrasound guidance. Each side received 20 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone. Bilateral RSB was conducted after the PIFB and the needle was inserted into the plane between the rectus abdominal muscle and its posterior sheath using an in-plane approach. After verifying needle placement, 15 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone was delivered to each side. In the control group, patients received no procedure and were administrated with traditional anesthetic protocol. Patients received continuous intravenous sufentanil (50 to 100 mg) and tropisetron (5 to 10 mg) at 2 ml·h-1 for the first 48 hours after surgery.

Sponsors

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Male or female adult patients aged 45 to 70 years, awaiting elective cardiac surgery, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes II or III were eligible.

Exclusion criteria

contraindications to punctual or local anesthetic drugs, a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use, and an inability to communicate or refuse to enroll.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QoR-15 at 24hat 24 hours after surgerythe global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number rating score (NRS)NRS at 24 hours and 72 hours after surgeryPostoperatvie pain was evaluated using a number rating score (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain possible).
QoR-15 at 72hQoR-15 at 72 hours after surgerythe global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 72h after surgery
postoperative adverse eventsduring hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 dayspostoperative adverse events included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCEs), moderate to severe acute kidney injury (AKI), moderate to severe acute liver injury, reintubation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
chronic painat 3 months after surgerypersistent postoperative pain lasting beyond 3 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
hospital costsduring hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 daysTotal cost of patients during hospitalization
hospital length of stay (LOS)From the date of admission until the date of discharging, assessed up to 30 daysFrom the date of admission until the date of discharging
Postoperative mechanical ventilationThe time from the end of operation to the removal of tracheal intubation, assessed up to 30 daysThe time from the end of operation to the removal of tracheal intubation

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026