Skip to content

Comparison of Effectiveness Between Active Release Technique and Hold Relax Technique in Patients With Piriformis Syndrome

Comparison of Effectiveness Between Active Release Technique and Hold Relax Technique in Patients With Piriformis Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06437327
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-05-31
Start date
2023-07-15
Completion date
2024-06-20
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Piriformis Syndrome

Brief summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial and the purpose of this study is to compare the effects between active release technique and hold relax technique in patients with Piriformis syndrome.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects between active release technique and hold relax technique in patients with piriformis syndrome pain, range of motion, and functional disability, in adults (age: 25-55 years) 1. Numeric pain rating scale 2. Goniometer 3. Oswestry Disability Questionairre Data will be collected before and after the intervention protocol for each participant. Data collection procedure: Participants of interest would be approached and explained about the research. Informed written consent will be taken. Pre and post-intervention scores will be recorded.

Interventions

PROCEDUREElectrotherapy

Hot pack for 10 minutes Interferential Current (IFC) for 10 minutes

PROCEDUREActive release technique

Active release technique is applied (patient is prone lying with knee flexed, Pressure is applied on taut band and patient is asked to move the leg in internal rotation to achieve maximal lengthening) Repetitions 5 to 7 times hold for 5 to 20 seconds

PROCEDUREHold relax technique

This technique is applied while the patient is in supine lying with one leg crossed over the other Patient is instructed to contract the piriformis against the manual resistance for 5 to 10 secs Then 15 secs of passive stretch is given repetitions x 5 times

Sponsors

Foundation University Islamabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gender: Both male and female * Individuals aged 25-55 years * Tenderness to palpation over sciatic foramen * Positive FAIR Test.

Exclusion criteria

: * History of hip, pelvic, or Femoral fractures. * Malignancies. * Avascular necrosis of Femoral head. * Inflammatory conditions (e.g. Rheumatoid Arthritis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity2 weeksNumeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): ICC (0.93-0.96).It has a scale of 0-10 or 0-100 points and can be given verbally or in writing.
Physical Function using Oswestry disability Questionnaire2 weeksPhysical Function will be measured using Oswestry disability Questionnaire
Hip internal rotation range of motion2 weeksHip internal rotation using Goniometer

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammad Ali, MS-MSKPT*
qasim111298@gmail.com03415161695

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026