Case-based Learning, Narrative Medicine
Conditions
Brief summary
This was a prospective, longitudinal, single-center nonrandomized controlled study. A total of 36 first- and second-year general practice residents of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were voluntarily enrolled in the experimental group. The remaining 9 residents served as a control group. The experimental group received narrative medicine training combined with CBL training. The control group received normal CBL training. None of the participants had previously had any training in narrative medicine. Teaching evaluation scores were measured for all subjects at baseline and 1 year after the training.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALnarrative medicine training combined with CBL training
The experimental group received narrative medicine training combined with CBL training.
BEHAVIORALCBL training
The control group received normal CBL training.
Sponsors
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to 28 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* first- and second-year general practice residents of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Exclusion criteria
* third-year general practice residents of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction Survey of Residents in the Experimental Group | 12 months | The satisfaction survey was divided into five levels, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The higher percent of agree means better result. |
| Comparison of the SEGUE scale scores Between the Experimental Group and the Control Group | 12 months | The SEGUE scale scores were generated by assigning a value of 1 for yes, 0 for no and 0.5 for cannot answer. High scores indicate stronger clinical communication skills. |
| Comparison of the JSE-S scale scores Between the Experimental Group and the Control Group | 12 months | The JSE-S scale scores adopts a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The higher total score indicating a greater level of empathy. |
| Comparison of the SEGUE scale in Different Grades Before and After Training in the Experimental Group | 12 months | The SEGUE scale scores were generated by assigning a value of 1 for yes, 0 for no and 0.5 for cannot answer. High scores indicate stronger clinical communication skills. |
| Comparison of the JSE-S scale in Different Grades Before and After Training in the Experimental Group | 12 months | The JSE-S scale scores adopts a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The higher total score indicating a greater level of empathy. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed