Skip to content

The Effect of Informing the Relatives of Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery

The Effect of Informatıon Provıded to the Relatıves of Patıents Undergoıng Open Heart Surgery on the Qualıty of Lıfe and Caregıver Burden.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06436872
Enrollment
94
Registered
2024-05-31
Start date
2022-05-27
Completion date
2023-10-30
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregiver Burden, Life Quality, Open Heart Surgery

Keywords

open heart surgery, life quality, caregiver burden, nursing information

Brief summary

The goal of this type of study clinical trial is to determine the effect of informing the relatives of patients undergoing open heart surgery on the patients; quality of life and caregiver burden.The main question it aims to answer are: H1: Informing caregivers of patients undergoing open heart surgery improves the quality of life of patients. H2: Informing caregivers of patients undergoing open heart surgery reduces caregiver burden.Relatives of patients who have undergone open heart surgery will be informed about home care before discharge. The researcher will compare the study group with the control group to see if the information given to the caregiver makes a difference on the patient's quality of life.

Detailed description

In the study, patients were assigned to the study and control groups via the randomizer.org website. The Caregiver Information Form was administered by the nurse researcher in a face-to-face meeting with the caregiver. The Patient Introduction Form was filled out by the researcher from the patients'; files. The Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale was administered by the researcher through a face-to-face interview with the patient. The Caregiving Burden Scale was introduced to the caregiver by the researcher and filled in by the caregiver himself. The Caregiver Tracking Form, prepared to track the patient and the caregiver, was applied to the caregiver by the researcher in order to determine the caregivers zero point. The first data collection was carried out 48 hours after the patient was admitted to the service and before information was given. Caregivers in the study group were given 45 minutes of training and a booklet in line with the training booklet prepared according to daily life activities aimed at improving the patients quality of life and reducing the caregiver's care burden. The caregivers in the study group were given the researcher's contact number and were able to reach the researcher whenever they needed. Patients in the control group underwent standard procedure; No information, training booklet or contact number was provided. The Caregiver Information Form was administered by the researcher in a face-to-face meeting with the caregiver. The Patient Introduction Form was filled out by the researcher from the patients'; files. Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale was administered by the researcher. The Caregiving Burden Scale was introduced to the caregiver by the researcher and filled in by the caregiver himself. The Caregiver Tracking Form, prepared to track the patient and the caregiver, was applied to the caregiver by the researcher in order to determine the caregiver's zero point. Initial data were collected between 48 hours after the patient was admitted to the ward and before discharge. Caregiving burden scale and multidimensional quality of life form were applied to both groups at the 4th week, 8th week and 12th week. Patients in the intervention group were informed again according to their needs.

Interventions

OTHERinforming patients with using a booklet

The intervention group was informed before discharge and was given an information booklet. A phone number was given so that the researcher could contact the nurse. In the 4th week, 8th week and 12th week, information was given according to the information needs of the patient and caregiver.

Sponsors

Trakya University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The data analysed by a independent researcher

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for patients: * Over 65 years of age, * Does not have any psychological problems and can communicate in Turkish * Literate, * Having undergone open heart surgery for the first time * After being taken to the Cardiovascular Surgery Service, they are stable after completing the 48-hour critical period, * Elderly individuals who agreed to participate in the research constituted the patient sample of the study. Inclusion Criteria for caregivers * The person who is primarily responsible for the patient care and will accompany the patient for 12 weeks, Caregivers, * Between the ages of 18-65, * Does not have any psychological problems and can communicate in Turkish, * The caregiver sample was created by caregiver individuals who agreed to participate in the research.

Exclusion criteria

for patients: * Those with neurological or metabolic diseases that may cause functional disability * Previously had open heart surgery * Patients with mental and cognitive dysfunction * Patients who did not attend at least one of the post-surgical evaluations for any reason were excluded from the sample.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multidimensional quality of life scale12 weeksThe multidimensional quality of life scale, which is psychometrically strong, short, easy to apply and suitable for patients diagnosed with Cardiovascular Disease, is a tool developed by Avis et al. for the purpose of multidimensional measurement of HRQoL and whose Turkish validity and reliability was obtained by Demir. The total score of the scale varies between 35-245.
Caregiver burden scale12 weeksIt was developed by Zarit, Reever and Bach-Peterson in 1980 to evaluate the stress experienced by caregivers of individuals in need of care. The evaluation of the scale is made based on the total score, and a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 88 points can be obtained from the scale. . 0-20 points obtained from the scale are classified as little/no burden, 21-40 points as moderate burden, 41-60 points as severe burden and 61-88 points as extreme burden. A high scale score indicates that the distress experienced is high.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026