Colorectal Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
screening
Brief summary
Alaska Native men have the highest rates of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the US. Screening can prevent disease and improve survival. A previous study tested text messages to increase colorectal cancer screening in Alaska Native patients of the Southcentral Foundation healthcare system in Anchorage, Alaska. The intervention improved screening by 50% in women, but it had no effect in men. The current study aimed to culturally tailor the intervention for Alaska Native Men, and to test it with a randomized controlled trial among patients at the Southcentral Foundation.
Detailed description
Alaska Native men have higher colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality than any other US racial or ethnic group. Screening can prevent CRC and improve treatment outcomes by detecting disease in early stages, but Alaska Native men also have low CRC screening uptake. Colonoscopy is the most accurate CRC screening method and results in the most years of life saved. It only requires rescreening every 10 years, but it is a clinic- based procedure and needs extensive preparation. Other screening options include home-based tests that detect blood in the stool and require rescreening every year. More recently, a home-based method has been developed that tests stool for DNA indicative of CRC and requires rescreening every 3 years. Current guidelines recommend CRC screening for average risk adults starting between ages 45-50, but people at higher risk should start at younger ages. Many interventions have been developed to promote CRC screening. Among these, interventions that use text messaging or other electronic health messages to reach people outside of the clinical setting have shown promise for improving CRC screening. In a previous study, the research team developed an intervention that sends up to 3 text messages to Alaska Native people patients of the Southcentral Foundation (SCF) healthcare system in Anchorage, Alaska. The intervention was tested in a randomized controlled trial with 2,386 Alaska Native SCF patients ages 40-75. The intervention increased CRC screening by 50% in women, but it had no effect in men. The current study used a theory-based approach to culturally tailor the previous text message intervention for Alaska Native men. Investigators conducted a randomized trial to test the effectiveness of the tailored intervention with 998 Alaska Native men ages 40-75 who were active patients at SCF. Eligible men were identified from the electronic medical record and randomized in equal proportions to the control condition or to one of three intervention arms (messages only, messages plus gift card incentive, messages plus raffle incentive). The primary outcomes were completed CRC screening documented in the electronic medical record within 6 months of sending the first text message, and any scheduled visit for pre-screening or screening documented in the medical record during follow-up. The study obtained a waiver of consent, and no individuals were directly recruited or enrolled in the study. Follow-up was entirely ascertained through the electronic medical record, and cohort attrition was not applicable.
Interventions
Intervention sends up to 4 motivational messages by text or email to Alaska Native men who are active patients and due for colorectal cancer screening. Incentive arms include promise of a $50 gift card or entry into a raffle for prize worth about $200 if they complete screening.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Parallel arm randomized controlled trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Alaska Native or American Indian racial identity * Male gender identity * Active patient of the Southcentral Foundation in Anchorage, Alaska * Empanelled to primary care provider in the Anchorage or local Valley area * Eligible for routine preventive colorectal cancer screening
Exclusion criteria
* None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | Six months | Screening procedure documented in the electronic medical record |
| Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | Six months | Pre-screening or screening visit scheduled in the electronic medical record during follow-up |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The trial obtained a waiver of consent, and no individuals were directly recruited or enrolled. Screening-eligible men who met all other criteria were identified in the electronic health record and randomly sampled for inclusion in the study cohort.
Pre-assignment details
Prior to sending the first electronic message, we re-queried the electronic health record and removed men who had completed colorectal screening in the interval between randomization and launching the trial.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control The control arm received usual care for colorectal cancer screening outreach, and did not receive any study-related electronic messages. | 250 |
| Messages This arm received electronic messages to promote colorectal cancer screening, but did not receive any notices about additional incentives. | 250 |
| Gift Card This arm received the same electronic messages as the Messages arm, and was additionally promised a $50 gift card if they completed colorectal screening by the target date. | 248 |
| Raffle This arm received the same electronic messages as the Messages arm, and were additionally promised they would be added to a raffle (\
$200 prize value) if they completed screening before a target date. | 250 |
| Total | 998 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Gift Card | Control | Messages | Raffle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 40-44 years | 87 Participants | 78 Participants | 82 Participants | 79 Participants | 326 Participants |
| Age, Customized 45-49 years | 40 Participants | 47 Participants | 47 Participants | 47 Participants | 181 Participants |
| Age, Customized 50-54 years | 39 Participants | 46 Participants | 40 Participants | 29 Participants | 154 Participants |
| Age, Customized 55-59 years | 26 Participants | 29 Participants | 29 Participants | 32 Participants | 116 Participants |
| Age, Customized 60-65 years | 56 Participants | 50 Participants | 52 Participants | 63 Participants | 221 Participants |
| Previous screening Not previously screened | 212 Participants | 214 Participants | 210 Participants | 210 Participants | 846 Participants |
| Previous screening Previously screened | 36 Participants | 36 Participants | 40 Participants | 40 Participants | 152 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 248 Participants | 250 Participants | 250 Participants | 250 Participants | 998 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 248 Participants | 250 Participants | 250 Participants | 250 Participants | 998 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 250 | 0 / 250 | 0 / 248 | 0 / 250 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 250 | 0 / 250 | 0 / 248 | 0 / 250 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 250 | 0 / 250 | 0 / 248 | 0 / 250 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening
Screening procedure documented in the electronic medical record
Time frame: Six months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | Any screening documented | 11 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | No screening documented | 239 Participants |
| Messages | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | No screening documented | 234 Participants |
| Messages | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | Any screening documented | 16 Participants |
| Gift Card | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | Any screening documented | 18 Participants |
| Gift Card | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | No screening documented | 230 Participants |
| Raffle | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | Any screening documented | 19 Participants |
| Raffle | Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening | No screening documented | 231 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit
Pre-screening or screening visit scheduled in the electronic medical record during follow-up
Time frame: Six months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | Visit scheduled | 8 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | No visit scheduled | 242 Participants |
| Messages | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | No visit scheduled | 230 Participants |
| Messages | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | Visit scheduled | 20 Participants |
| Gift Card | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | Visit scheduled | 18 Participants |
| Gift Card | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | No visit scheduled | 230 Participants |
| Raffle | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | Visit scheduled | 17 Participants |
| Raffle | Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit | No visit scheduled | 233 Participants |