Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Europe, Prevention, Cancer, Cancer prevention, Primary prevention, Mental health, Mental health problems, Patient Navigation, Implementation science, Co-design, Longitudinal, Person-centered
Brief summary
Prevention is essential for reducing cancer-related mortality. However, people with mental ill-health often face difficulties in accessing cancer prevention services. The EU-funded CO-CAPTAIN project aims to co-adapt and implement the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in this underserved population. This evidence-based and patient-centred intervention aims to support patient empowerment through removal of systemic barriers, provide social support and promote timely access to primary prevention services.
Detailed description
Cancer and mental ill-health constitute leading public health problems in Europe. More than 84 million people in the European Union (EU) report living with an on-going mental ill-health condition. While issues concerning mental health are of great importance, they often overshadow physical problems that people with mental ill-health face. Such is cancer, which is more prevalent in people with mental ill-health and is also the second most common cause of death in this population. People with mental ill-health often have difficulties in accessing quality cancer prevention services, but are also additionally overlooked in research which makes them overall an underserved population. What data is available, shows that potential reasons for these higher cancer morbidity and mortality rates are linked to more engagement in risky health behaviour (especially higher prevalence of smoking as well as overweight and obesity) but also experiences of significant barriers when accessing the highly fragmented heath care systems. Timely and evidence-based preventive strategies including optimizing health care pathways provide a solution to the high cancer morbidity and could improve overall health outcomes in this disadvantaged population. One such mixed-skill strategy is Patient Navigation. Therefore, the overall goal of the CO-CAPTAIN project is to co-adapt the Patient Navigation (PN) model focusing on primary cancer prevention and to see if this model can prove to be beneficial in supporting individuals with mental ill-health through care services to reduce cancer risk factors by increasing knowledge, health literacy and empowerment. The Patient Navigation Model is an innovative, evidence-based and patient-centred intervention, which supports patient empowerment through removal of systemic barriers, providing social support and promoting timely access to primary prevention services. Based on implementation science and utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation (CFIR) as well as the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks, the CO-CAPTAIN project aims to reduce the gap in health inequalities for people with mental ill-health by reducing cancer burden and improving overall health, which will, in turn, reduce associated costs across health and social care systems in Europe. Moreover, the CO-CAPTAIN project aims to harness the transformative potential of the integrated care pathways in cancer as well as provide health and social care policy recommendations for the adoption and implementation of the Patient Navigation Model across Europe. The adapted Patient Navigation Model will be implemented in four European countries (Austria, Greece, Poland, Spain) and its potential to enable and improve access and utilization of primary cancer prevention measures for people with mental ill-health will be evaluated. The study will employ a mixed-methods design allowing for both exploratory and confirmatory research. The project has been funded by the HORIZON EUROPE Framework Program (Call: Research and Innovation actions supporting the implementation of the Mission on Cancer (HORIZON-MISS-2022-CANCER-01-01) - Improving and upscaling primary prevention of cancer through implementation research) and is coordinated by the Medical University of Vienna.
Interventions
OTHERPatient Navigation
CO-CAPTAIN focuses on co-designing and piloting and evaluating the implementation of patient navigation (PN) for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health. Patient Navigators, trained professionals with experience working with people with mental ill-health, will assist people with mental ill-health in gaining access to and utilizing appropriate primary cancer prevention measures offered within the respective healthcare and social system (including smoking cessation and physical activity and nutritional interventions). For this purpose, Patient Navigators will offer regular appointment with participants, apply motivational interviewing and aid in accessing appropriate materials while aiming at empowering participants in taking an active role and making better and more informed decisions regarding their health.
Sponsors
Senior Europa Sociedad Limitada
Prolepsis Institute for Preventive, Environmental and Occupational Medicine
Universitat Politècnica de València
STICHTING INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR INTEGRATED CARE
Medical University of Lodz
Consejería de Familia, Juventud y Política Social, Comunidad de Madrid
Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
Fundacion para la Investigacion e Innovacion Biosanitaria de Atencion Primaria
Mental Health Europe - Sante Mentale Europe
University Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece
Fundacion para el Fomento en Asturias de la Investigacion Cientifica Aplicada y Tecnologia
Consejeria de Salud - Principado de Asturias
Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturias
Medical University of Vienna
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older * Individuals who have been diagnosed with one or more mental disorders OR healthcare professionals involved in care of individuals with mental ill-health * Sufficient knowledge of language
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals unable to give consent due to diminished capacity * Individuals who do not provide consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Health data of participants as assessed by self-report or electronic health reports | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in health outcomes and socio-economic risk factors in the course of study participation. Next to socio-demographic data, participants will indicate their health status, alcohol consumption, sexual risk behavior, sun exposure, and vaccination status by self-report or electronic health reports. |
| Nutritional intake of participants as assessed by the Rapid Prime Diet Quality Score Screener (rPDQS) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome nutritional intake. Nutritional intake will be assessed by the Rapid Prime Diet Quality Score Screener (rPDQS; range: 0-52, where higher values indicate healthier nutritional intake). |
| Smoking behavior of participants as assessed by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FND) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome smoking behavior. Smoking behavior will be assessed by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FND; range: 0-10, where higher values indicate higher nicotine dependence). |
| Physical activity of participants as assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome physical activity. Physical activity will be assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; range: 0-19278 MET minutes per week, where higher values indicate more time spent on physical activity). |
| Depressive symptoms of participants as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms will be assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; range: 0-27, where a higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms). |
| Generalized anxiety of participants as assessed by the 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome generalized anxiety. Generalized anxiety will be assessed by the 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7; range: 0-21, where higher values indicate more severe anxiety symptoms). |
| Health-related anxiety of participants as assessed by the Whiteley Index (Whiteley-6-R) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome health-related anxiety. Health-related anxiety will be assessed by items from the Whiteley Index (Whiteley-6-R; range: 0-24, where higher values indicate more health anxiety symptoms). |
| (Health-related) Quality of life of participants as assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHO-QOL-BREF) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in (health-related) quality of life. (Health-related) Quality of life will be assessed by items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHO-QOL-BREF; range: 4-20, where higher values indicate higher quality of life). |
| (Health-related) Quality of life of participants as assessed by the descriptive system of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in (health-related) quality of life. (Health-related) Quality of life will be assessed by items from the descriptive system of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L, where each dimension has a range from 1-5, where a higher value indicates more severe problems). |
| (Health-related) Quality of life of participants as assessed by the EQ visual analogue scale of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in (health-related) quality of life. (Health-related) Quality of life will be assessed by items from the EQ visual analogue scale of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L, range: 0-100, where higher values indicate better subjective health). |
| Self-efficacy of participants as assessed by the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in self-efficacy. Self-efficacy will be assessed by items from the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; range: 10-40, where higher values indicate higher perceived self-efficacy). |
| Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers (HPS) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers (HPS) as part of health literacy. HPS as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the HPS scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived HPS). |
| Having sufficient information to manage one's own health as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Having sufficient information to manage my health (HSI) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in having sufficient information to manage one's own health as part of health literacy. Having sufficient information to manage my health (HSI) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the HSI scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived HSI). |
| Actively managing one's own health as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Actively managing my health (AMH) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in actively managing one's own health as part of health literacy. Actively managing my health (AMH) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the AMH scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived AMH). |
| Social support as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Social support of health scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in social support as part of health literacy. Social support as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the social support of health scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived social support for health). |
| Appraisal of health information as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Appraisal of health information (CA) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in appraisal of health information as part of health literacy. Appraisal of health information (CA) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the CA scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived CA). |
| Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (AE) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to actively engage with healthcare providers as part of health literacy. Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (AE) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the AE scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived AE). |
| Navigating the healthcare system as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Navigating the healthcare system (NHS) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to navigate the healthcare system as part of health literacy. Navigating the healthcare system (NHS) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the NHS scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived NHS). |
| Ability to find good health information as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Ability to find good health information (FHI) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to find good health information as part of health literacy. Ability to find good health information (FHI) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the FHI scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived FHI). |
| Understand health information well enough to know what to do as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Understand health information well enough to know what to do (UHI) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to understand health information well enough to know what to do as part of health literacy. Understanding health information well enough to know what to do as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the Understand health information well enough to know what to do (UHI) scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived UHI). |
| Use of healthcare services of participants as assessed by self-reports | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in use of healthcare services. Use of healthcare services will be assessed by self-reports. |
| Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health as assessed by an economic evaluation | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by evaluating cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. To assess cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, an economic evaluation will be carried out by analyzing health outcomes and costs (healthcare costs, cancer costs, burden). |
| Satisfaction with care of participants as assessed by self-reports and items from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in satisfaction with care. Satisfaction with care will be assessed by self-reports and items from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with medical care). |
| Discrimination experiences of participants as assessed by self-reports | 18 months | To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in discrimination experiences. Discrimination experiences will be assessed by self-reports. |
| Facilitators of the Patient Navigation Model as experienced by participants and assessed by qualitative semi-structured interviews | 18 months | The co-adapted Patient Navigation Model will be evaluated by assessing facilitators of the intervention to determine its effectiveness. Experiences of people with mental ill-health, navigators, and healthcare professionals involved in care of people with mental ill-health will be considered. Qualitative data will be gathered using semi-structured interviews. |
| Barriers of the Patient Navigation Model as experienced by participants and assessed by qualitative semi-structured interviews | 18 months | The co-adapted Patient Navigation Model will be evaluated by assessing barriers of the intervention to determine its effectiveness. Experiences of people with mental ill-health, navigators, and healthcare professionals involved in care of people with mental ill-health will be considered. Qualitative data will be gathered using semi-structured interviews. |
Countries
Austria, Greece, Poland, Spain
Contacts
Primary ContactIgor Grabovac, MD, PhD
Backup ContactHanna M. Mües, MSc
Outcome results
None listed