Skip to content

Evaluation of the HekaHeart Platform in Medication Management for Heart Failure Patients

HeakHeart Phase 1 Proof of Concept Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06433687
Acronym
HekaHeart POC
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-05-30
Start date
2025-10-31
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2025-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Keywords

Heart Failure, Guideline-directed medical therapy, Remote monitoring, Medication optimization

Brief summary

This pilot study will test the feasibility of a novel digital health technology-enabled platform, HekaHeart, developed to facilitate comprehensive medical management, including medication initiation, titration, e-prescription eligibility, remote patient monitoring, and communication of care coordination activities, for patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) not currently on all four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).

Detailed description

Heart Failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure in the United States (US). The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the management of HF strongly recommends quadruple therapy for all patients with HFrEF, which includes: beta-blockers (BB); renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) inhibitors such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi); mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA); and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Unfortunately, suboptimal adoption of GDMT persists despite mounting, unambiguous evidence of its substantial benefit on patient outcomes (including mortality) across numerous large-scale studies. Further, following initial prescription of quadruple therapy, augmentation of each pillar to target or highest tolerated dosing is critical to achieve maximum benefit, as shown in a recent multinational randomized controlled trial (STRONG-HF) where rapid uptitration to optimal doses of GDMT reduced the risk of death and hospitalization just 180 days after an acute HF episode. Yet, multiple contemporary registry studies continue to reflect suboptimal uptake and dose escalation of GDMT for patients with HFrEF in real-world clinical practice due to both clinical and patient-based barriers. The HekaHeart platform is a comprehensive remote care and monitoring-based method for GDMT titration and management. The platform uses a virtual team of clinicians with expertise in HF to manage GDMT prescription, dose escalation, and symptom monitoring for patients with HFrEF as a means to both provide personalized patient care and support while alleviating clinician burden. Once a patient is fully optimized with respect to GDMT, they are transitioned back to routine clinical care. The present study will evaluate the usability of the HekaHeart platform to initiate, monitor, and manage GDMT for patients with HFrEF. The study will prospectively recruit eligible patients from ambulatory HF clinics affiliated with Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS). Consented patients will be onboarded to the HekaHeart platform for GDMT management by HF disease management clinicians, which will include medication adjustment and remote patient monitoring to assess laboratory results, changes in body weight, blood pressure, and heart rate. Throughout the study, patients will engage in short message service (SMS), video and phone check-ins with clinicians, who will leverage standardized titration protocols to guide medication optimization, monitor patient progress and symptoms, and collect, analyze and respond to remote monitoring data. After 45 days, patients will be transitioned back to usual care. The primary outcome is the Net Promoter Score (NPS), collected at study offboarding by each participant, and used to assess patient satisfaction with the HekaHeart platform and experience. The secondary outcome is the increase in proportion of HFrEF patients prescribed four pillars of GDMT. Other secondary endpoints include percent of patients successfully onboarded to the HekaHeart platform, proportion of patients whose GDMT is titrated toward target or maximally tolerated dosing, number scheduled visits attended, and percent of platform GDMT recommendations implemented.

Interventions

DEVICEHekaHeart platform medication management and remote monitoring

Onboarding to the HekaHeart platform which includes a personalized GDMT management plan along with remote monitoring kits including a scale, blood pressure cuff, and heart rate monitor. Patients engage in video and phone calls with clinicians who will use established standardized clinical protocols to guide medication and vital optimization. Once patients are determined to be maximally titrated on all GDMT, they are transitioned back to standard clinical care.

Sponsors

HekaHeart
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documentation of HFrEF as evidenced by the presence of LVEF ≤40% reading at any time within the last 12 months, 1. with associated symptoms of HF 2. or an elevated NT-proBNP 3. or a hospitalization for HF within the preceding 12 months * Currently receiving care at YNHHS * Currently not on all 4 recommended classes of GDMT (BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNi, MRA, and SGLT2i)

Exclusion criteria

* Currently pregnant or breast feeding * Received or listed for cardiac transplantation * Planned or present durable left ventricular-assist device (LVAD) * Goals of treatment are palliation * Currently has a condition(s) that limit survival to \<1 year * Unable to provide informed consent * Unwilling to use remote monitoring devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Net Promoter ScoreAssessed at time off patient offboarding (45 days after enrollment)A metric used to gauge patient satisfaction with the HekaHeart platform. Patients are asked how likely they are to recommend the platform to a friend on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being not likely to recommend, and 10 being highly likely to recommend).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of enrolled patients onboarded to HekaHeartAssessed from time of enrollment to 45 days post-enrollmentPercent of patients who consented to the study who have successfully onboarded to the HekaHeart plan with an optimized medication management plan.
Percent of onboarded patients successfully prescribed a new medicationAssessed from time of enrollment to 45 days post-enrollmentPercent of patients who have been prescribed a new medication within the HekaHeart platform after enrollment.
Percent of scheduled study check-ins attended by patientsAssessed from time of enrollment to 45 days post-enrollmentPercent of patients who attended a scheduled check-in (via SMS, text, email, or phone)
Percent of patients on all eligible guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) classesAssessed at time off patient offboarding (45 days after enrollment)Patients assessed for number of eligible classes of eligible GDMT medications prescribed.
Time to maximum titrationAssessed from time of enrollment to 45 days post-enrollmentTime in days to optimal titration of all eligible classes of GDMT as determined by clinician judgement and expertise
Time from patient enrollment to first remote prescriptionAssessed from time of enrollment to 45 days post-enrollmentTime in days to first prescription made in HekaHeart platform
Ease of implementation of HekaHeart platformAssessed up to one month post- study completionDetermined via qualitative survey assessment of clinicians which asks how well the HekaHeart platform integrates into existing systems and workflows
Percent of medication recommendations implementedAssessed from time of enrollment to 45 days post-enrollmentPercent of HekaHeart-recommended medications prescribed

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026