Skip to content

Role of Ultrasound Guide Greater Occipital Nerve Block at Second Cervical Vertebra in Migraine Headache Prophylaxis

Role of Ultrasound Guide Greater Occipital Nerve Block at Second Cervical Vertebra in Migraine Headache Prophylaxis in Patients With Failed Oral Prophylaxis Medication : A Randomized Controlled Study in Thailand

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06432127
Enrollment
108
Registered
2024-05-29
Start date
2024-05-30
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2024-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine Disorders

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled study in Thailand. is to find if there is a role of local anesthetic greater occipital nerve block at Cervical spine level 2 under ultrasound guide in prophylaxis of episodic migraine and chronic migraine in patients with failed oral prophylaxis medication. According to guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine attacks in episodic and chronic migraine,the primary and secondary outcome were monitoring followed by these research guideline After informed consent, volunteer will be stratified random into 2 groups of injection agent at unilateral greater occipital nerve block on headache site under US guide by pain physician * Normal saline * 0.5% bupivacaine the injection was done 2 times between Week 0 and week 4 as to wean off placebo effect the volunteer will be monitor by pain diary at 1 month before intervention at week 0,4,8,12 and follow up at week 24 for Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) ,Thai Hospital-Anxiety-depression index(Thai-HADS)

Detailed description

* Neurologist screening candidate volunteers for this study, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria * Candidate volunteers attended pain clinic for he protocol detail about this research and informed consent * After signing consent, Volunteers would be stratified randomization into 2 groups between Normal saline and bupivacaine * Volunteers would be done base line headache diary for 1 month before performing the procedure (Week -4 to week0) * At Week 0, Volunteers would be applied local anesthetic cream at skin injection site before done the procedure * According to stratified randomization, Pain interventionist and also volunteers would be blinded to the group * First Unilateral greater occipital nerve block at Cervical spine level 2 (C2) was done under ultrasound guide (Week0) * Telemedicine Follow up at week 2 * Second Unilateral greater occipital nerve block at C2 level was done under ultrasound guide (Week4) * Volunteers would be follow up via telemedicine and done headache diary until 3 months after 1st injection * Volunteers would be follow up according to outcome monitoring protocol in Week 0,4,8,12,24

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Unilateral Greater occipital nerve block at C2 level under ultrasound guide with needle in plane technique during ultrasound using normal saline 3 mL

DRUGBupivacaine

Unilateral Greater occipital nerve block at C2 level under ultrasound guide with needle in plane technique during ultrasound using 0.5% Bupivacaine 3 mL

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 -65 years old 2. Diagnosis as episodic migraine or chronic migraine and had indication to use migraine prophylaxis 3. Volunteer prefer to use research procedure as first choice of migraine prophylaxis 4. Volunteer already had migraine prophylaxis treatment but still has the one of these following problem 4.1 Frequency of migraine attack more than 4 times/month 4.2 Severe migraine headache & disturb daily life in spite of using migraine prophylaxis 4.3 Having migraine medication side effect, either from prophylaxis or acute attack medication and cannot titration medication dosage 4.4 migraine attack not improved as using many migraine prophylaxis medications 4.5 Having contra-indication to use prophylaxis migraine medication or standard prophylaxis procedure such as botulinum toxin 4.6 Cannot take prophylaxis medication daily (low compliance) 4.7 Had financial problems in using standard prophylaxis migraine medication or procedure 4.8 Medication overuse headache

Exclusion criteria

1. Had these type of headache in combination with migraine * cervicogenic headache * occipital neuralgia * secondary headache 2. Had contraindication on greater occipital nerve block injection at cervical spine level 2 under ultrasound-guided such as skin infection in needle site 3. Allergy to local anesthetic 4. Uncontrolled psychiatric disorder in 3 months before attending research 5. Cannot understand or reading, writing Thai language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change of Frequency headache day /monthat Week 0,4,8,12,24 compared to base line at 1 months before injection procedureby using headache diary
change of migraine attack day /month from headache diaryat Week 0,4,8,12,24 compared to base line at 1 months before injection procedureby using headache diary

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thai-Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scaleat Week 0,4,8,12,24 compared to base line at 1 months before injection procedureThai-Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Thai HADS) , divided into anxiety and depression part ,if either of the score in each depression or anxiety more than 11 mean abnormal
change in severity of headache day per month (decrease of moderate-severe pain)at Week 0,4,8,12,24 compared to base line at 1 months before injection proceduredecrease of moderate-severe pain day per month compare to baseline by using headache diary
Patient's reported outcome measurement (PGI-C)at Week 0,4,8,12,24 compared to base line at 1 months before injection procedurePatient's reported outcome measurement (PGI-C), score grading 1-7 by 1 very much worse to very much improved , 7 means very much worse
Healthcare outcomes/quality of lifeat Week 0,4,8,12,24 compared to base line at 1 months before injection procedureby EuroQoL- (EQ-5D) measured health-related quality of life with 5 dimension (mobility, health care, usual activity, Pain, Anxiety/depression and in each of them had 5 grading 1-5 by 1 means no problem and 5 means extreme problem) after having score in each dimension, calculated utility score would be done
Thai-Migraine Disability Assessmentat Week 12,24 compare to baselineThai-Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) ,Score 0 to 21+ ( 0-5 marks = little or no disability and more than 21+ =severe disability

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactRAVIWON ATISOOK, M.D.
raviwon.ati@gmail.com+66819140784

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026