Skip to content

RAPID-POP a Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of the Pressure Optimization Protocol (POP )Versus Conventional Stent Deployment Strategy During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06430892
Enrollment
400
Registered
2024-05-28
Start date
2024-05-15
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2024-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction, Acute

Brief summary

Efficacy of the Pressure Optimization Protocol (POP) versus Conventional Stent Deployment Strategy during Primary PCI: An Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial The investigators will compare conventional rapid stent inflation/deflation during primary PCI with higher pressure and prolonged duration of stent deployment Study Hypothesis: The POP in stent deployment is superior to the conventional stent deployment approach with a significantly higher achievement of the TIMI III flow, significantly lesser occurrence of slow flow/no-reflow, and significantly higher rate of ST-Segment resolution during primary PCI.

Detailed description

Primary Objective The primary objective is to compare the rate of TIMI III flow achievement, slow flow/no-reflow, and ST-segment resolution between POP versus conventional stent deployment strategy during Primary PCI. Secondary Objective The secondary objective is in-hospital outcome (to compare the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization between POP versus conventional stent deployment strategy during Primary PCI.) Material and Methods Study design: An open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) with blinded outcome assessment Setting: Cath Lab NICVD Karachi ,Hyderabad and Sukkur Duration of study: 6 months Stent Deployment Protocol: Patients will be randomly assigned to either POP or conventional stent deployment approach groups in 1:1 ratio using the block randomization method. SAMPLE SIZE : 400 patients will be randomized into 2 groups with 1:1 Concealment: Allocation schema will remain accessible to the randomization and allocation team and will be communicated to the screening and recruitment team on a patient-on-patient basis. Blinding: This will be an open-label study, however, the outcome assessment will be blinded. A de-identified CD and post-PCI ECG with a unique tracking ID will be evaluated by the team of independent consultants, who will be blinded to the stent placement approach, and primary outcome variables i.e. TIMI flow, slow-flow/no-reflow, and ST-segment resolution will be assessed. Immediately post-procedure, a de-identified CD and post-PCI ECG with a unique tracking ID will be evaluated by the team of independent consultants, who will be blinded to the stent placement approach, and primary outcome variables i.e. TIMI flow, slow-flow/no-reflow, and ST-segment resolution will be assessed. All the patients will be followed at 30 days and incidence of MACE will be recorded. In order to ensure the integrity and reliability of the data, all procedures and imaging assessments will be carried out by clinicians and technicians trained and standardized in the respective methodologies. Moreover, data will be stored in a secure, electronic database with restricted access to maintain patient confidentiality and data security. Regular data audits will be conducted to ensure accuracy and consistency throughout the trial. Data Analysis: Firstly, patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics will be summarized using means and standard deviations for continuous variables and frequencies with percentages for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be used to determine the time-to-event data for outcomes such as target vessel failure, target vessel revascularization, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction. Log-rank tests will be employed to compare survival curves between the POP and Rapid I/D groups. Cox proportional hazards models will be used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome of interest, adjusting for potential confounders. For categorical outcomes, chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests will be used, as appropriate. Continuous outcomes will be assessed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests based on data distribution. Any unmatched or imbalanced variables between the two groups will be controlled using propensity score matching. To address potential confounding factors and biases, a sensitivity analysis will be performed. Lastly, all statistical analyses will be two-tailed, with a significance level set at p \< 0.05. Statistical software such as SPSS or R will be utilized for the analysis.

Interventions

Patients presented with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent deployment

Sponsors

National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pakistan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This will be an open-label study, however, the outcome assessment will be blinded. A de-identified CD and post-PCI ECG with a unique tracking ID will be evaluated by the team of independent consultants, who will be blinded to the stent placement approach, and primary outcome variables i.e. TIMI flow, slow-flow/no-reflow, and ST-segment resolution will be assessed

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized into two groups in 1:1 , one arm will be treated with POP protocol and the other arm will be treated with conventional method.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years and above. * Patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. * Presence of significant coronary artery stenosis (greater than 70% diameter reduction) confirmed by angiography.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with Killip class IV * Patients with significant comorbidities such as end-stage renal disease or advanced liver disease which may interfere with the procedure or follow-up. * Prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). * Refusal to give consent for study participation or procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TIMI III flow: TIMI III flow is defined as normal flow with complete filling of the distal vascular bed.periprocedurally (after stent deployment)To assess flow in the vessel after deployment of stent
Slow-flow/no-reflowperiprocedurally (after stent deployment)To assess is there any Slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon , which is TIMI flow grade \< 3 and as myocardial blushing grade (MBG) \< 2.
ST-segment resolutionTime frame:60minutes after the procedureAssessment of ST-segment resolution , The electrocardiographic resolution of the ST-segment elevation is defined as a reduction of \> 50% of the ST-segment elevation in the same lead within 60 min after the index procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cerebrovascular accident ( CVA /Stroke)Time frame: during hospitalization (in-hospital)Cerebrovascular events during hospital stay
Cardiovascular death ( CV death)Time frame: during hospitalization (in-hospital)cardiovascular death
ArrhythmiasTime frame: during hospitalization (in-hospital)Significant arrhythmias requiring treatment
Myocardial infarctionTime frame: during hospitalization (in-hospital)Myocardial infarction of different territory
Stent thrombosisTime frame: during hospitalization (in-hospital)same territory Myocardial infarction

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactAbdul Hakeem, professor
abdulhakeem@gmail.com+923355554342
Backup ContactShakir Zada, fellow
dr.shakir637@gmail.com+923469467449

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026