Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite;Oral Hygiene, Pain and Treatment Effect

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06430710

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-28

Start date

2022-09-25

Completion date

2024-03-27

Last updated

2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Overbite

Keywords

Anterior deep bite, Intrusive arch, Miniscrews

Brief summary

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

Detailed description

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) \[miniscrew\] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

Interventions

DEVICEIntrusion

2 different methods for incisor intrusion

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Intervention model description

Sixteen patients with anterior deep over bite participated in two groups each group contains eight patients

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

15 Years to 22 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding. 2. 70% to 100% overbite. 3. High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors. 4. All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.

Exclusion criteria

1. Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area. 2. Any history of trauma or root canal treatment. 3. Previous orthodontic treatment. 4. Low lip line duing social smile. 5. Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Measure distance of insicors intrusion	2 years	measure in mm the distance of apical movement

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Pain intensity	8 months	By unit on Visual Analogue Scale

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026