Skip to content

Personalized Ventilation Based on Ventilation-perfusion Mismatch and Lung Recruitability

Personalized Ventilatory Strategy Based on Ventilation-perfusion Mismatch and Lung Recruitability in Moderate-to-severe ARDS Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06430554
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-05-28
Start date
2024-06-08
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

Acute respiratory distress syndrome;Positive end expiratory pressure; Prone Position; Ventilation/perfusion matching.

Brief summary

This observational study will explore the effects of PEEP and position on regional lung ventilation-perfusion mismatch by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients with different lung recruitability.

Detailed description

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by impaired ventilation-perfusion matching, which not only indicates the severity of the condition but also contributes to ventilation-induced lung injury. Higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone position could improve ventilation-perfusion mismatch by recruiting collapsed lungs and facilitating more homogeneous ventilation, but these benefits might depend on lung recruitability. The present study aims to elucidate the regional effect of PEEP(low and high) and body position(supine and prone) on the ventilation-perfusion matching. Also endeavors to establish correlations between alterations in ventilation-perfusion matching patterns and the inherent lung recruitability. Participants will be deeply sedated and paralyzed, ventilated in volume-controlled with protective ventilation (tidal volume=6-8 mL/Kg of predicted body weight and respiratory rate set to obtain normal pH). Then the patients will be sequentially assigned to each of four conditions as follows: Low PEEP, supine position; High PEEP, supine position; Low PEEP, prone position; High PEEP, prone position. High PEEP and low PEEP is defined as 15 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O (or airway opening pressure, either of which was higher) respectively. Each measurement (e.g., arterial blood gas analysis, respiratory parameters, hemodynamics, EIT measurements) will be performed at least 15 minutes after changing ventilator settings and at least 1 hour after changing body positions. The timing of turning patients from supine to prone position is determined by the clinical team. To assess lung recruitability, a single-breath derecruitment maneuver will be performed by changing PEEP 15 to 5 cmH2O (or airway opening pressure, either of which was higher) in supine position. Patients with recruitment-inflation ratio over the median value are defined as high recruiters. EIT data will be collected by standard device (Infinity C500, Drager, Germany) with a sample rate of 50 Hz. The EIT belt will be placed directly below the armpits, between the third and fifth intercostal spaces. This positioning of the EIT belt will be maintained consistently during both supine and prone positions. A bolus of 10 ml 5% NaCl will be injected during a respiratory pause (≥8 s) through the central venous catheter to assess lung ventilation and perfusion distributions. The primary endpoint is EIT-based ventilation-perfusion matching (V/Q match%).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Zhongda Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age ≥18 years 2. Moderate-to-severe ARDS as per the 2023 ESICM definition 3. Undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation 4. Planned prone position based on the attending physicians' decisions 5. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. age ≥85 years 2. Pregnancy 3. Severe hemodynamic instability (\> 30% increase in vasopressors in the last 6 hours or norepinephrine \> 0.5 µg/kg/min) 4. Clinically suspected elevated intracranial pressure (\>18 mm Hg) 5. Bronchopleural fistula 6. Contraindication to EIT monitoring (e.g. burns, pacemaker, thoracic wounds limiting electrode belt placement) 7. Severe hypernatremia (\>170mmol/L) 8. Re-admission of patients already enrolled in this study, or patients who are participating in other studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilation-perfusion matching (V/Q match%)Through study completion (within 24 hours)corresponding to the pixels that are both ventilated and perfused divided by the total number of pixels ventilated and/or perfused

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percentage of dead spaceThrough study completion (within 24 hours)corresponding to the ventilated but nonperfused pixels divided by the total number of pixels ventilated and/or perfused
percentage of shuntThrough study completion (within 24 hours)corresponding to the perfused but nonventilated pixels divided by the total number of pixels ventilated and/or perfused
Respiratory system complianceThrough study completion (within 24 hours)The compliance of respiratory system
PaO2/FiO2 ratioThrough study completion (within 24 hours)PaO2/FiO2 ratio

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTFengmei Guo, PhD, MD
fmguo2022@163.com+8613813841261
CONTACTZhiqian Zha, MM
15505083904@163.com+8615505083904
STUDY_CHAIRFengmei Guo, PhD, MD

Nanjing Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026