Skip to content

Effects of Global Postural Re-education Versus Laser-guided Exercise in Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Effects of Global Postural Re-education Versus Laser-guided Supervised Exercise in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06430255
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-05-28
Start date
2024-05-16
Completion date
2024-06-25
Last updated
2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Back

Brief summary

Effects of Global Postural Re-education Versus Laser-guided Supervised Exercise in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Detailed description

The objective of this study will be to investigate the effectiveness of GPR or LGE, in addition to PNE and home exercise program. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity, disability, and fingertip to floor test. The secondary outcomes will be pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and depression.

Interventions

Program for treatment

OTHERLaser-guided Supervised Exercise

Program for treatment

Sponsors

Taif University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 45 years. * Diagnosed with NSLBP. * Experiencing NSCLBP for ≥ 3 months and score at least 3/10 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with a condition that hinders their ability to engage in physical exercise (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease, orthopedic impairments; balancing problems). * Diagnosed with severe spine conditions (such as fractures, tumors, ankylosing spondylitis, or inflammatory disorders). * Diagnosed with neurological problems (such as spine nerve problems or cauda equina syndrome) * Diagnosed with mental illness or severe cognitive impairment that made it impossible to follow the PNE program. * With a physical condition that made it impossible to complete the PNE program (the timed up and go test had to be completed in 10 seconds at a minimum). * Receiving alternate therapy for related pathologies (myopathies and neurological diseases) that prevented them from completing the PNE program.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityOne monthassessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale which goes from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
Disability7 weeksmodified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability (ODI) questionnaire Each part has six statements rated from 0 (least difficult to accomplish action) to 5 (most difficult) The overall score goes from 0 to 50 (the greatest impairment) In individuals with LBP
Fingertip-to-floor test7 weeksexcellent metric properties for LBP

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain catastrophizingOne monthwill be used to measure pain catastrophizing. Scores range from 0 (never) to 4 (always) for each item (total score = 0-52). Higher ratings reflect more catastrophizing of pain
KinesiophobiaOne monthwill be assessed using the 11 items that make up the TSK-11. The overall score is between 11 and 44 points. A higher score indicates a greater fear of discomfort, movement, and harm.
Depression4 weeksPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), The PHQ-9 is a self-administered 9-item questionnaire with four statements ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) for each item. A higher total score (20-27) suggests that the patient is suffering from severe depression.

Contacts

Primary ContactAlaa Baboor
Alaa.s.baboor@hotmail.com966596628155
Backup ContactIbrahim Alkayshan
Ibrahim.alkayshan@gmail.com966501272615

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026