Abdominal Tumor, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Postoperative Analgesia, Ropivacaine
Conditions
Keywords
liposomal bupivacaine, ropivacaine, transversus abdominis plane block, laparoscopic lower abdominal tumor resection, opioid consumption
Brief summary
Few studies have compared the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided TAP blocks with Liposomal bupivacaine(LB) versus ropivacaine in reducing postoperative opioid usage in patients undergoing laparoscopic lower abdominal tumor Resection. Therefore, we are conducting this prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of LB and ropivacaine for TAP blocks among patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal procedures.
Detailed description
This study aimed to investigate the impact of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on postoperative opioid usage for ultrasound(US)-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in laparoscopic colorectal resections. We divided 76 patients into two groups. An injection of bilateral TAP blocks was administered to LB group using 133mg liposomal bupivacaine in each block (266mg total), and to R group using 20 ml 0.25% ropivacaine in each block (40 ml total). Opioid consumption and pain scores at 6h, 24h, 48h and 72h were recorded postoperatively, as well as the total intraoperative remifentanil dose, the hospital stay lengths after surgery, and adverse events including dizziness, nausea, and vomiting.
Interventions
DRUGLiposomal Bupivacaine
After induction of anesthesia, bilateral TAPB was performed under ultrasound guidance. The patients in the bupivacaine liposome group were injected with bupivacaine liposome 133mg(10ml+ 10ml 0.9% normal saline mixed into 20ml)/ point (two points in total).
DRUGRopivacaine
Patients in ropivacaine group were given 0.25% ropivacaine 20ml/ point (two points in total).
Sponsors
Sun Yat-sen University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of lower abdominal tumors 2. ASA grade II-III 3. Age: 18-70 years.
Exclusion criteria
1. (1) The patient does not agree to participate in the clinical study 2. (2) The patient has a clear history of opioid tolerance or allergy 3. (3) The patient has a history of local anesthetic allergy 4. (4) Previous history of dementia, mental illness or other central nervous system diseases 5. (5) Have a history of chronic pain or are taking opioids and other analgesics 6. (6) Patients are generally in poor condition with a history of serious diseases of cardiovascular system, respiratory system, digestive system, urinary system or central nervous system, and may not survive for more than 3 months 7. (7) The patient had any of the following conditions in the 12 months before surgery: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass grafting, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism 8. (8) Pregnant women 9. (9) Unable to cooperate with follow-up or poor compliance 10. (10) Patients with acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest or shock during surgery or hospitalization 11. (11) ASA score above grade III.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative opioid use | 3 days postoperatively | The amount of drug used in the postoperative analgesia pump |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain score | 3 days postoperatively | Postoperative VAS score |
| Postoperative adverse reactions | 3 days postoperatively | Postoperative adverse reactions were followed up |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactPing Yu
Backup ContactJingdun Xie
Outcome results
None listed