Skip to content

Clinical Outcome in Patients With INPH

Phenotypes, Biomarkers and Pathophysiology in INPH

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06428734
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-05-24
Start date
2024-05-15
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2024-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, CSF, Glympathic System, Omic

Keywords

Hydrocephalus, Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine the clinical spectrum and natural progression of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH ) and related disorders in a prospective single center study, identify digital, imaging and molecular biomarkers that can assist in diagnosis and therapy development and study the etiology and molecular mechanisms of these diseases.

Detailed description

Due to the heterogeneity of the etiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus , almost all published studies on the clinical outcome and prognostic factors of iNPH are relatively limited, and most of them are retrospective. It is not clear which is the most reliable predictor of clinical outcome. Therefore, the researchers conducted this prospective cohort study to identify the occurrence, development and outcome of iNPH and determine the main prognostic factors through clinical scales, biomarkers and imaging. At study visits a standardized clinical examination will be performed including application of clinical rating scales. At all study visits, patients will be asked to donate biosamples; biomaterial collection is optional and participants can elect to participate in sampling of blood, urine, CSF, and/or a muscle biopsy. Optionally, additional examinations may be performed including imaging,such as DTIALPS, neurophysiological examination, analysis of patient or observer reported outcomes and analysis to characterize molecular biomarkers.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESThydrocephalus group

Diagnostic Test: high throughput sequencing and electromyography Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics and imaging, such as DTIALPS

Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics and imaging, such as DTIALPS

Sponsors

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients who was diagnosed as idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Exclusion criteria

* patient received surgical treatment or interventional treatment before patient is pregnant patient unable to complete follow-up patient with other types of hydrocephalus other nervous system diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DTIALPSChange from Baseline at 6 months after VP shuntChange of DTIALPS singal intensity in the resting state fMRI in iNPH patients compared with normal healthy group. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients functional MRI were analzed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mini mental state ExaminationChange from Baseline at 6 months after VP shuntA score for cognitive ability; range 0-30; higher indicates higher severity.
Gait evaluationChange from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt10 meters walking test were evaluated of iNPH patients.
Kiefer scoreChange from Baseline at 6 months after VP shuntA score for iNPH severity; range 0-26; higher indicates higher severity.
Change in the resting state fMRIChange from Baseline at 6 months after VP shuntChange of BOLD singal intensity in the resting state fMRI in iNPH patients compared with normal healthy group. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients functional MRI were analzed.
omic pattern of CSF in iNPH patientsBefore surgery in lumbar CSFComparing the omic pattern differences in CSF between iNPH patients and normal age-matched normal volunteers by the analysis of mass spectrometry. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients omic pattern were analzed.
modified Rankin scaleChange from Baseline at 6 months after VP shuntA score for functional neurological status ; range 0-5; higher indicates higher severity.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactfengzeng jian, md
jianfengzeng@xwh.ccmu.edu.cn01083198899
Backup Contactxin qu, md
xinqu@xwhosp.org01083198899

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026