Skip to content

Effects of Otago Exercise Program in Falls, Balance and Physical Performance in Stroke Patients

To Determine the Effects of the Otago Exercise Program on the Frequency of Falls, Balance Capabilities, and Overall Physical Performance in Stroke Patients.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06426862
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-05-23
Start date
2024-05-23
Completion date
2024-10-15
Last updated
2024-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Cardiovascular Attack, Otago Exercise Program, Berg Balance Scale, Time Up & Go Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment

Brief summary

This study aims to determine the effects of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) on falls and balance as well as overall physical performance. Participants will be divided into two groups; control and intervention group. It is a week-long study, the participants will be assessed through the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Time Up and Go (TUG) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA).

Detailed description

The previous literature suggested that the Otago exercise showed significant improvement in terms of fall and balance. Most of the Studies were conducted on the elderly population but limited studies are available regarding stroke. This study will look at the effect of Otago exercise on stroke patients. The Otago exercise consists of 17 exercises; strengthening and balancing exercises. The participants will receive Otago exercise and routine physiotherapy treatment for six weeks. The participants will go through three assessments; Baseline Assessment, After 3 weeks assessment and final assessment. For association, a mixed method ANOVA test will be used.

Interventions

OTHEROtago Exercise Program

Otago exercise program Strengthening Exercise Knee extensor, Hip adductors, heel and toe raising Balance exercise Sit to stand, Knee bending, one leg standing, tandem stance, side walk, walk and turn around, tandem walk, backward walk, heel and toe walk, stair climbing

OTHERControl Group

Routine physiotherapy like strengthening, stretching, postural awareness, gait and balance training.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke * Medically stable patients with acute to subacute level of stroke recovery (\< 6 month). * Patients 40 plus age * Berg balance scale \<45 and \>20 score * TUG test scoring \>20 sec

Exclusion criteria

* Participants having cognition problem or language barrier * Physical disability (fracture or amputation) other than stroke * Previous surgery 6 weeks * Cardiovascular and pulmonary disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Berg Balance ScaleBaselineThe BBS was used to assess the quantitative measure of balance and fall risk among the older population through direct observation of their performance. The 14 items scale of total scoring 56 and each item has a scaling of 0 to 4. The scoring up to 0 to 20 represents impaired balance, 21 to 40 indicate acceptable while \>40 represent good balance.
Time Up & Go TestBaselineThe TUG test was used to assess the functional mobility of the participants. The gait and balance maneuvers used in daily life are attributed to functional mobility. The participants were required to stand up, walk away through 3 meters or 10 feet and turn back to sit in the chair at starting. The individuals who cover the distance in \>20 seconds are considered as dependent in their activities while those who complete the task in \<20 sec indicate independence in ADLs.
Fugl-Meyer AssessmentBaselineMotor impairment is the most common complication of stroke; it was measured by FMA quantitatively. The scale is divided into 5 domains; sensory & motor function, balance, joint range of motion and joint pain. Each domain has a scale of 0 to 2 score while the total scoring of the scale is 226 score.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactMuhammad Baqir, MS
Baqirm409@gmail.com+923129008037

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026